Page 305 of 342
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 1:57 pm
by tigerpranke
laurentina wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:58 am
Hello
I entered notes in Gießen, Germany.
In my .csv files I get the coordintes: 50.551 / 8.6188 which is Allendorf an der Lahn (in the dot west of Gießen)
correct coordinates for Gießen are: 50.584 / 8.6784
Please change, thanks
Gießen has more than one zip code. The zip code for your suggested coordinates is 35390.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:54 pm
by Elmo
My parents received bills from a fuel station just south of Olías del Rey. Because the town of Olías del Rey itself is the wrong dot, and because the suburb is named San Pedro de Alcántara, I have entered it as
Olías del Rey-San Pedro de Alcántara. The coordinates are 39.913°N, 4.008°W (i.e. -4.008° if you enter it in the system).
(
I know that I post this before the 24 hours have expired, but I thought that a little explanation was appropriate.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 12:58 am
by Burdie
Elmo wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:54 pm
My parents received bills from a fuel station just south of Olías del Rey. Because the town of Olías del Rey itself is the wrong dot, and because the suburb is named San Pedro de Alcántara, I have entered it as
Olías del Rey-San Pedro de Alcántara. The coordinates are 39.913°N, 4.008°W (i.e. -4.008° if you enter it in the system).
(
I know that I post this before the 24 hours have expired, but I thought that a little explanation was appropriate.
I have called the city profile Urbanización San Pedro de Alcántara, I hope it is to everyone's satisfaction
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2019 1:45 pm
by siriusLT
this should be merged with
Pilis I
missing dot:
Pilviškiai, Marijampolė county, Lithuania. 54.7188, 23.2219
Thanks!
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2019 3:44 pm
by LArdennais
Done for all.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:41 pm
by Akai
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:19 am
by Burdie
Done, Thank you for let us know
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2019 1:49 pm
by siriusLT
Missing dot:
Ūdekai, Šiauliai county, Lithuania. 56.154921, 24.024283
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:09 pm
by bhoeyb
https://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=201268369
Who has replaced this Zambian dot with the incorrect coordinates
? I was there myself and I had coordinated this dot correctly! Please, replace it back to the first coordinates and don't blindly trust google, especially in extreme remote areas like this one.
Thanks.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 11:15 am
by Elmo
I received
this bill in
Afferden (Gelderland), but it has been mistakenly placed in
Afferden (Limburg). Please change.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 3:03 pm
by Burdie
De biljet is nu op de juiste plek
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2020 2:25 pm
by Kleman
Hi !
I'm waiting for the dot of this note:
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=201741238
41°02'57.7"N
0°59'59.4"E
Thank you
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2020 4:00 pm
by tigerpranke
Your map should show the dot now.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:30 pm
by Kleman
Perfect ! Thank you !
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 12:35 am
by groentje
Thank you, Burdie(?) for giving
Stewarton and
Lurgan their dot.