Page 322 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2022 7:13 pm
by Montgomery Burns
https://www.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187889453

Can this be corrected to Lille, France (or maybe this some plain old fakery...)?

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 11:09 pm
by vermeer
I just discovered a new town.

Beauquesne, France > https://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223054677
Google Maps: 50.08418470876737, 2.3926162844536414

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beauquesne

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 11:31 pm
by Kleman
vermeer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 12, 2022 11:09 pm I just discovered a new town.

Beauquesne, France > https://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223054677
Google Maps: 50.08418470876737, 2.3926162844536414

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beauquesne
8) 8) :lol: 8O

It's just near Rubempré !! :wink:
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223054682

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 4:00 pm
by GNUGNU
Could somebody fix the dot of this notes?

https://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223193467
https://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223193462

Saone, postal code 38079 is place in the municipality of Tione.

Coordinates of Saone are
46°02′34.37″N
10°46′00.08″E

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saone

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:34 am
by tigerpranke
GNUGNU wrote: ↑Wed Oct 19, 2022 4:00 pm Could somebody fix the dot of this notes?

https://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223193467
https://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223193462

Saone, postal code 38079 is place in the municipality of Tione.

Coordinates of Saone are
46°02′34.37″N
10°46′00.08″E

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saone
Done. :)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 11:33 am
by groentje
While I love discovering new places, Busdongo de Arbás and Busdongo are really the same place.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 1:56 pm
by Burdie
groentje wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 11:33 am While I love discovering new places, Busdongo de Arbás and Busdongo are really the same place.
Thank you, Well spotted

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 2:01 pm
by groentje
According to Wikipedia, it's without the accent on Arbás, apparently. I corrected it accordingly.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 2:24 pm
by Burdie
groentje wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 2:01 pm According to Wikipedia, it's without the accent on Arbás, apparently. I corrected it accordingly.
I have a question in the Spanish forum, I am waiting for the result. Please have a little bit patient with the other places, I am a little behind and had to go to work now

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2022 5:40 pm
by Elmo
I noticed that one of my dots is missing: Puente de la Cerrada. The coordinates are probably in the northern dot, however, I (or rather my parents) received the bills at a café at the south bank of the Guadalquivir (see the red dot on the map below). Please be so kind to edit the coordinates to 37.957, -3.189.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2022 6:03 pm
by tigerpranke
Elmo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 5:40 pm I noticed that one of my dots is missing: Puente de la Cerrada. The coordinates are probably in the northern dot, however, I (or rather my parents) received the bills at a café at the south bank of the Guadalquivir (see the red dot on the map below). Please be so kind to edit the coordinates to 37.957, -3.189.
Done. I changed the coordinates because your parents were the only ones who got notes at this place so far.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 9:10 pm
by negative
Minsk is in Belarus, not Lithuania
minsk.PNG
minsk.PNG (13.04 KiB) Viewed 9962 times

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:47 am
by M92
Hi! I entered two notes (https://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=224837283 and https://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=224837284) in Santa Venera, neighbourhood of Mascali, Italy. The issue is that when I click on the city, I get redirected to Santa Venera, Malta. Is it possible to correct this mistake? Thank you in advance.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 10:08 am
by negative
This is not a city/town Aukstaija National Park https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=252572
as Aukštaitija National Park office located in Palūšė suggestion to merge it with https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=230779

Location Uikių kaimas (Uikiai village) https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=252575 to be renamed to Uikiai

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 12:19 pm
by tigerpranke
M92 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:47 am Hi! I entered two notes (https://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=224837283 and https://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=224837284) in Santa Venera, neighbourhood of Mascali, Italy. The issue is that when I click on the city, I get redirected to Santa Venera, Malta. Is it possible to correct this mistake? Thank you in advance.
negative wrote: ↑Fri Jan 06, 2023 10:08 am This is not a city/town Aukstaija National Park https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=252572
as Aukštaitija National Park office located in Palūšė suggestion to merge it with https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=230779

Location Uikių kaimas (Uikiai village) https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=252575 to be renamed to Uikiai
Both done.