Page 334 of 342

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2025 1:39 pm
by Laufbe
I ve got the same request for Tiszaújváros, 3580 Hungary where i get the 3 first bills for this City coming out an euro Atm from otp bank.

Thanks

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2025 6:22 pm
by tigerpranke
Gauss wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:52 pm ...
Please wait at least 48 hours after entering a note before complaining about a missing dot (see also the FAQ).
...
In addition to that, a link to the note would be very helpful :wink:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:48 am
by petox
Hi I entered three notes (one example) in Gradac, Croatia,
but somehow they got linked to Slovenian Gradac.
Please have a look. Thanks.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2025 3:11 pm
by tigerpranke
petox wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:48 am Hi I entered three notes (one example) in Gradac, Croatia,
but somehow they got linked to Slovenian Gradac.
Please have a look. Thanks.
Done.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 11:23 am
by erasmuston
This bill https://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=246839259 was entered in Rijswijk, Gelderland https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijswijk_(Gelderland) rather than in Rijswijk, Zuid-Holland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 11:50 am
by Crazy Bob
erasmuston wrote: Mon Jun 23, 2025 11:23 am This bill https://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=246839259 was entered in Rijswijk, Gelderland https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijswijk_(Gelderland) rather than in Rijswijk, Zuid-Holland
The bill should be added to the profile of this Rijswijk: https://eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=125416

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 5:27 pm
by Burdie
erasmuston wrote: Mon Jun 23, 2025 11:23 am This bill https://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=246839259 was entered in Rijswijk, Gelderland https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijswijk_(Gelderland) rather than in Rijswijk, Zuid-Holland
Citymanagers can only see the location and the postcode, Not the remarks. so there is no 3383 postcode and Rijswijk combination, Because there are more Rijswijks I had to made a decision- It is now corrected by someone

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 6:57 pm
by aplfi
Hello,

Dot for 90054 Jablonové in Slovakia is in very wrong location. It should be the dot north of Bratislava (green) but is somewhere in northern Slovakia (red)

Coordinates to Coop Supermarket in the village. Thanks if someone can correct this one!

48.348177881999476, 17.096831698783934

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 2:44 am
by Burdie
aplfi wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2025 6:57 pm Hello,

Dot for 90054 Jablonové in Slovakia is in very wrong location. It should be the dot north of Bratislava (green) but is somewhere in northern Slovakia (red)

Coordinates to Coop Supermarket in the village. Thanks if someone can correct this one!

48.348177881999476, 17.096831698783934
There are two Jablonové's that was the reason, It is now corrected. Please give us some time to sort things out (48 hours)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:20 am
by laurentina
I entered some notes in Brampton UK
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=169376

The dot is wrong. On my dotmap it shows the dot south of the real dot
could you please correct it

thanks

Image

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 9:15 pm
by wally2cv
Westerweg 80 1797RH Den Hoorn is Texel and not midden delftland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 6:59 am
by tigerpranke
laurentina wrote: Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:20 am I entered some notes in Brampton UK
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=169376

The dot is wrong. On my dotmap it shows the dot south of the real dot
could you please correct it

thanks

Image
wally2cv wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 9:15 pm Westerweg 80 1797RH Den Hoorn is Texel and not midden delftland
Done.

Providing a link to the note would be very helpful for the support :wink:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 10:53 am
by laurentina
Thanks for the Brampton Dot

Could you please add a dot to the following two places

Gatehouse of Fleet, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland, UK
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=247405522

and
Bankend, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland, UK
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=247399347

Thanks

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 6:48 pm
by tigerpranke
laurentina wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 10:53 am Thanks for the Brampton Dot

Could you please add a dot to the following two places

Gatehouse of Fleet, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland, UK
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=247405522

and
Bankend, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland, UK
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=247399347

Thanks
Done. The postal code DG1 4RU is Caerlaverock, so I moved your Bankend entry there.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2025 9:13 pm
by MDeen
Hi,

La Rhune 31780 :flag-es: https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=247618646

This is on the top of La Rhune where the restaurants and bars are on the Spanish side.
https://www.google.nl/maps/@43.3086237, ... FQAw%3D%3D