Page 6 of 6
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 2:02 pm
by Skylimit
Olivier wrote:
I would like to read more details about the bills, in the comments. It is a bit frustrating, when you have a hit, not to know more than its location. Did the last player get the bill in a shop? Is it fold? Dirty?
I do too... actually I built some waco personal project around this. After all your money flow is a perfect blueprint of who you are. So I enter exactly where, why and how I got it.
But this info is not public, only when you have a hit.
So behind every hit I will have, there will be a story.
And in the end, if you have many hits, bit by bit your life comes visible to others, but it is your past and not your present ...
Of course I don't really know if I will keep on doing this ... it's just another idea.
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 4:46 pm
by smh
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 5:02 pm
by Olivier
smh wrote:
You are right about moderators on this forum. There is hardly done any moderating at all. that can make the forum look messy at times. I think it's time for a few more moderators
I agree. I do my best. Craco and Philippe also.
We also don't want any censorship. People are responsible. But the forum is bigger and bigger (like the site).
I'll talk about it to Philippe...
Olivier
Re: Fraud status ...
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 5:07 pm
by HNL
EuroBillTracker wrote:Anyway, I email Vangelis and he gave me a convincing story about his series which I will not divulge for obvious reaons. So let's not all get carried away, ok ?
If all the notes are real: no problem
(it seems they are). So, we can track more euro's
. In that case, Vangelis could be the new number 1 at the end of 2002
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 8:33 pm
by Skylimit
smh wrote: If you compare the site of early januari with todays site then you would see a lot of differences. Most of which were implemented after a discussion on this forum.
Since you all saw this site developing, you have the sentiment "ouf, we've come a long way", while newcomers may have the sentiment "there's still a long way to go".
If you peep into wheresgeorge you'll see there's still lots of stuff that can be added.
If you say, there already were numerous discussions on ranking, that would explain why you're all on the same wavelength. Because something just didn't add up.
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 8:36 pm
by Skylimit
smh wrote:(and post a lot of messages)
btw, is that irritating to anyone ? I don't mind cutting back ... It's just that I have more time available now, and this will automatically reduce ....
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 10:56 pm
by smh
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2002 11:08 pm
by emmem
Just some short remarks.
Skylimit wrote:
I mean, the more statistics the better (to quote Flip the Coin)
I like the sound of that. Think I’ll start a new topic about that.
Skylimit wrote:
So a bit of movement, while waiting for a hit, I thought, could help.
You might be right about that. Gave me an idea. I will start a new topic about that too.
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2002 1:17 pm
by Skylimit
emmem wrote:
On the other hand your tree concept has awoken some curiosity in me. I am wondering now about tree statistics. How many users have referred users with not further referring. How many 2 steps, 3 steps… referrals. What is the average time between registering to the site and having a referred user.
To my surprise, I have found out yesterday evening, that it actually works better than I ever hoped. I'm using the level 1 referral users from the "stats" page, because I cannot drill deeper. But check this out ! I have been a member for 15 days, I referred 8 users directly to this site (+ 3 who are not on the list ... OK too bad, forget about them)
From these 8 users, 2 have never registered a note.
But the other 6 have input
twice as much notes as I have, and I only started referring users in after a couple of days ... (btw I have input 104 notes myself, my referals +/- 200 notes, in a week)
So there's no telling what you will find in level 2 & level 3 ... I'm interested in your results ! (also differences per country, so we can match them with your other stats)
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2002 8:37 pm
by emmem
Skylimit wrote:emmem wrote:
On the other hand your tree concept has awoken some curiosity in me. I am wondering now about tree statistics. How many users have referred users with not further referring. How many 2 steps, 3 steps referrals. What is the average time between registering to the site and having a referred user.
To my surprise, I have found out yesterday evening, that it actually works better than I ever hoped. I'm using the level 1 referral users from the "stats" page, because I cannot drill deeper. But check this out ! I have been a member for 15 days, I referred 8 users directly to this site (+ 3 who are not on the list ... OK too bad, forget about them)
From these 8 users, 2 have never registered a note.
But the other 6 have input
twice as much notes as I have, and I only started referring users in after a couple of days ... (btw I have input 104 notes myself, my referrals +/- 200 notes, in a week)
So there's no telling what you will find in level 2 & level 3 ... I'm interested in your results ! (also differences per country, so we can match them with your other stats)
I think it is better to create a new topic about this (will be easier to find back afterwards and will be better for new users joining I think). So I’m taking the liberty of doing so.