ART wrote: ↑Sat Aug 15, 2020 3:35 pm
JordiJanTaxi wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 10:50 amI must say that it would be cool to have again national letters.
To track, but in general it's better now.
Really? Why?
I thought that denominating series by printers was because ECB had taken the responsability of printing paper, which had been before on national banks' accounts. But it seems that banknotes are still commisioned to different countries' central banks. Then, why not keep national letters and printer codes separately? OK, I'm nobody, and off course, don't have the smallest decision capacity, but I would have kept the old system. Yes, I assume that most banknotes from Cyprus, Malta, Slovenia, Slovakia, Lithuania, etc., were printed in the Netherlands, and some in Germany and France, too. But, wasn't it nice to see a D, or an E, or an F, or a G, or an H in the serial numbers? Now we don't know anything. The commissioning registers are not public, or if they are (were), they are not (wouldn't be) clarifying anything. I mean: do we (can we) know if banknotes from UB27*** to UB98*** are comissioned to Banque de France, and UB99*** to UC23*** to Central Bank of Malta, and from UC24*** to UC68*** to Central bank of Cyprus? And if we could know it, which would be the difference btween these serialnumbers? NONE. The only "non-ordinary" thing we have (to call it somehow), are banknotes printed in Bulgaria.
Very boring...