EuroBillTracker

I agree with airis.

1) ddemerre continued entering notes after 14:04 and then with different serial numbers. The fact that he/she entered precisely 25 notes @ 50 EUR indicates to me that this may a package from the bank, including some brand new notes with successive serial numbers (that's how they are produced). Compare postings by Gabriela further up in this thread.

2) There is an obvious explanation for the letter in the postal code - especially indicated by the "-" between B and 3000.

I agree.

But it's still strange that it weren't Irish 50€ notes

Fons wrote: But it's almost impossible to enter many notes with almost the same number, espacially when it's from another country, and Spain is very far away from Ireland, but countries "give" notes to other countries so it could be both (false notes and real notes)

I wonder what it is.

Yes, in Ireland there are uncirculated Spanish 50 € notes. I have seen them entered previously too. And in December I did see that Irish tourists paid with Spanish 50€ notes at Rovaniemi airport.

Fons wrote: And what about the "weird" ZIP-code that doesn't excist?
It was B-3000 but in Belgium they only have 4 numbers.

Yes, but B is the country code for Belgium. I tested with Google:
Look the links.

I must say the notes aren't with almost the same number but the're entered by PITLER

2003-02-28 21:29:12. Vxxxx6394xxx Mxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:12. Xxxxx2019xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx3325xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx6922xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx4503xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Vxxxx3685xxx Mxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Lxxxx2403xxx Dxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx0252xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx3643xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx5183xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx9090xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx2752xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Vxxxx0881xxx Mxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx6854xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)


Did he said something elsewhere on the forum?

there were more pitler-notes at the other page

2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx0252xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx3643xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx5183xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx9090xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx2752xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Vxxxx0881xxx Mxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:29:11. Xxxxx6854xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)


and more:

2003-02-28 21:12:28. Xxxxx3112xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Xxxxx4826xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Nxxxx3651xxx Fxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Nxxxx7531xxx Fxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Nxxxx8193xxx Fxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Xxxxx6522xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Nxxxx1489xxx Fxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Sxxxx9403xxx Jxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Xxxxx1381xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Sxxxx8232xxx Jxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)

He got 3808 notes, Why is he still entering notes???
Or are all this notes real, I just ask, because I don't trust Pitler anymore!.

Fons wrote:He got 3808 notes, Why is he still entering notes???

Probably for the same reason as I (5490 notes): For the fun of it.

Donald wrote:

Fons wrote:He got 3808 notes, Why is he still entering notes???

Probably for the same reason as I (5490 notes): For the fun of it.

Yes
But his notes are ( all ) FAKE

I agree that pitler's notes look quite unusual, but how can you prove that they are faked?

The notes you mention look very ordinary:
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Xxxxx3112xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Xxxxx4826xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Nxxxx3651xxx Fxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Nxxxx7531xxx Fxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Nxxxx8193xxx Fxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Xxxxx6522xxx Rxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Nxxxx1489xxx Fxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Sxxxx9403xxx Jxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Xxxxx1381xxx Pxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)
2003-02-28 21:12:28. Sxxxx8232xxx Jxxxxx Lennestadt ( Germany, 57)

I only blame him for not giving his complete postcode, it should be 57368.

Donald wrote:I agree that pitler's notes look quite unusual, but how can you prove that they are faked?

He entered many notes with almost the same number and he also entered a lot of those notes in Lennestadt ITALY

Fons wrote:He entered many notes with almost the same number and he also entered a lot of those notes in Lennestadt ITALY

Well I don't know...

Pit made a hit again, the first person don't look weird to me but now it's a hit,
I hate pitler!,
Can someone stop him or is he entering real notes now??

This hit is also with the same users (Pitler and another one), that other one (Dribbel) was the first one who has entered these two notes, but he did it at 23-08-2002, so I think it's also a false user (maybe a friend from Pitler?)

Fons wrote:Pit made a hit again, the first person don't look weird to me but now it's a hit,
I hate pitler!,
Can someone stop him or is he entering real notes now??

Why would it be fake?
There are several months between the two registrations!!

You don't have any reason to hate someone here!

O.

Hard to believe that he found two notes, entered originally by the same user, just by chance. These two hits are clearly "suspicious".

However, I'm opposed to requests for blocking his account. I mean - at least we all know Pitler and that there are quite a few very suspicious hits he's involved in. If you block this account he might register with a different name and start over. Actually, it is nice of him that he sticks to his account even though he has been moderated so often.

Gauss wrote:Hard to believe that he found two notes, entered originally by the same user, just by chance. These two hits are clearly "suspicious".

Same for me ... looks like these hits are "friend"hits .