Page 64 of 343

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:34 pm
by Ord€p

Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:53 pm
by Jes
Look at this: http://es.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=144961

I entered a couple of notes there, but there is not dot :(

Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:22 pm
by Säbb
This is the wrong writing of this town in Turkey

Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:57 pm
by Phaseolus
This city (Saint-Paul) should be located 8 km west from Beauvais (60000 - Oise). :wink:

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:37 pm
by Yelverdack
The city of Malisevo/Malishevë in Kosovo
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=145075
has a bad location in EBT
the right coordinates are
42°28'55.20''
20°44'45.60''

could you correct it please ?

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:20 pm
by Kleman
hello
it seems "la Châtre" 36170
46° 34′ 59″ North
1° 59′ 16″ East
(wikipedia)
is not in the right dot

http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=44840961

I see in Google Earth (french grid) and this city where i've registered 2 notes doesn't highlight it real dot

:oops:

where's the problem ?
in EBT database or in the french grid ?


thanks

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:57 pm
by Gauss
The coordinates on record are 46.4078 N, 1.3892 E.
Google maps seems to locate "36170 La Châtre" somewhere north of St-Benoit-du-Sault, at 46.4575 N, 1.4232 E, while it is actually south of it. I won't check what coordinates you are quoting because you did it in the wrong format.

The same goes for the preceding post.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:05 pm
by Ewri
http://en.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=144733

the name should read - Guardamangia

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:24 pm
by Kleman
Gauss wrote:The coordinates on record are 46.4078 N, 1.3892 E.
Google maps seems to locate "36170 La Châtre" somewhere north of St-Benoit-du-Sault, at 46.4575 N, 1.4232 E, while it is actually south of it. I won't check what coordinates you are quoting because you did it in the wrong format.

The same goes for the preceding post.
sorry, I don't know how to translate internet coordinates in decimal format :? :oops:

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 6:20 am
by klapotec
Kleman wrote:sorry, I don't know how to translate internet coordinates in decimal format :? :oops:
one possibility is this website

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:19 am
by ErGo
Kleman wrote:sorry, I don't know how to translate internet coordinates in decimal format :? :oops:
If you click at Wikipedia normaly on coordinates, you will get a Geohack-site, where some different formats (eg. decimal) are shown!

But it is also possible to calculate it very easy:
x°y'z'' => decimal: x + y/60 + z/3600

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:56 am
by Kleman
thanks everybody
i'll calculate this soon
(I need my dot :D )

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:59 pm
by Phaseolus
2008-06-25 21:31:30 Pxxxx3976xxx Gxxxxx Tilburg ( France, 5042SX)
2008-06-25 21:31:30 Pxxxx0188xxx Gxxxxx Tilburg ( France, 5042SX)
2008-06-25 21:31:30 Xxxxx0165xxx Rxxxxx Tilburg ( France, 5042SX)
2008-06-25 21:31:30 Uxxxx3608xxx Lxxxxx Tilburg ( France, 5042SX)


Tilburg is in NL and not in France

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:07 pm
by klapotec
Phaseolus wrote:2008-06-25 21:31:30 Pxxxx3976xxx Gxxxxx Tilburg ( France, 5042SX)
2008-06-25 21:31:30 Pxxxx0188xxx Gxxxxx Tilburg ( France, 5042SX)
2008-06-25 21:31:30 Xxxxx0165xxx Rxxxxx Tilburg ( France, 5042SX)
2008-06-25 21:31:30 Uxxxx3608xxx Lxxxxx Tilburg ( France, 5042SX)


Tilburg is in NL and not in France
Yes - that is not a problem of the city profiles, however, but one of note entry. :roll:

Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:25 am
by roberdy
What happened to the city profile of Burghausen?

Wrong dot on the city profile (correct is 48.1667N,12.8333E)

And the name "Burghausen (Salzach)" sounds really strange (actually Burghausen is situated at the Salzach, but that name is extremely uncommon. "Burghausen" would be better (there's no other stand-alone commune) or, if you want to, "Burghausen (Oberbayern)" (as used for the train station).


And BTW please merge Çolakli and Çolaklı.
("Çolaklı" is the correct turkish spelling)