Luckily we also have a few of them in our memberbase.Nerzhul wrote: The code and design? Texts? A mess, lawyers would be happy![]()

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus
Well, I tried it. After pressing "OK" I received the message "Banned word"Elmo wrote:I second Mr Euro not to enter fake bills at .com. Instead, I would enter real bills at .com as well with this link in the comment field:
http://forum.eurobilltracker.eu/viewtopic.php?t=10438
This is more decent, and in case you get a hit at .com, you may have spread the word a little more.
Well said.diogocanilho wrote:€€F wrote:Yannn wrote:People, I dont agree with your hesitations, really! We're all comunicating in the .eu's forum, can't you see? We belong to this community.
Well.. The money for keeping EBT alive has been coming from Avij. If Avij says he doesn't need that money, then what would be the problem? EBT has had no money problems that should be corrected!Kleman wrote:The matter is money ?
Giro wants add for is own profit ? or only for keeping EBT alive ?
all EBTusers want answers
okay thanksDakkus wrote:Well.. The money for keeping EBT alive has been coming from Avij. If Avij says he doesn't need that money, then what would be the problem? EBT has had no money problems that should be corrected!Kleman wrote:The matter is money ?
Giro wants add for is own profit ? or only for keeping EBT alive ?
all EBTusers want answers
Therefore, keeping EBT alive cannot be the reason.
And then we've got only one possible reason left...
I totally agree with you, snakefire. It was not Giro who hijacked the site. It was his to decision to make to move it to a new server, and so he did.snakefire77 wrote:
Though Giro owns the .com domain, he does not own the whole contents (unless every contributor transfered their property, but I doubt this is the case). And if I understand correctly, Giro wasn't very active these days. Making significant changes such as moving the website to a new server or making it commercial should have first been discussed between all the contributors.Economist wrote:It was not Giro who hijacked the site. It was his to decision to make to move it to a new server, and so he did.
Also, I keep on reading we do not want it commercialized? Why not?
I personally don't like some kind of intrusive adverts. And voluntary contributors may dislike the site becoming commercial. These are reasons why this should have been discussed.Economist wrote:A lot of other website, which like EBT solely live from user content, are commercial. Take Facebook, MySpace and so forth. What' wrong with that?
Banners could be added in such an emergency case (temporarily or not). But this would be done to cover the costs of the website (hosting, etc.), not to earn money.Economist wrote:Or loses his job and can't cover the costs of 200 Euro per month anymore.
This can be a solution, but not the only one. And currently, there's no emergency to change.Economist wrote:A commercial website appears to be a much more sustainable long-term strategy, at least compared to what we have today.
I think that if Giro employs lawyers, none of the sites will survive.Economist wrote:Having said all that, only one of the sites should and will survive, and if Giro doesn't employ some lawyers, it's going to be the EBT.eu site.