Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

de*lerger · Post by **de*lerger** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:48 pm

Could you please change the profile-name Terschelling Midsland to Midsland ? The Terschelling-prefix is only used in written addresses, the name itself is just Midsland

[img]http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:r4s ... l/%3Fimage%[/img]

bhoeyb · Post by **bhoeyb** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:56 pm

Someone has merged 2 totally different places with the same name Hofstade (ID 40978) into 1 profile: Hofstade 1981 and Hofstade 9308 are 2 different communities who are 50 km from each other

. Thanks for splitting them.
Thanks De Slak for reporting.

klapotec · Post by **klapotec** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 3:12 pm

bhoeyb wrote:Someone has merged 2 totally different places with the same name Hofstade (ID 40978) into 1 profile: Hofstade 1981 and Hofstade 9308 are 2 different communities who are 50 km from each other . Thanks for splitting them.
Thanks De Slak for reporting.

You mean Hofstade (Aalst) and Hofstade (Zemst)? Has been split and renamed accordingly.

bhoeyb · Post by **bhoeyb** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:38 pm

klapotec wrote:
bhoeyb wrote:Someone has merged 2 totally different places with the same name Hofstade (ID 40978) into 1 profile: Hofstade 1981 and Hofstade 9308 are 2 different communities who are 50 km from each other . Thanks for splitting them.
Thanks De Slak for reporting.
You mean Hofstade (Aalst) and Hofstade (Zemst)? Has been split and renamed accordingly.

Indeed, thanks.

knospe · Post by **knospe** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:07 pm

Just out of curiosity:

Brugge-centrum: 9.257 - 10.431 - 19.688
Kristus-Koning: 2.114 - 2.358 - 4.472
Sint-Pieters: 3.591 - 3.947 - 7.538
Sint-Jozef: 2.655 - 2.659 - 5.314
Koolkerke: 1.546 - 1.618 - 3.164
Sint-Andries: 9.511 - 9.916 - 19.427
Sint-Michiels: 5.870 - 6.418 - 12.288
Sint-Kruis: 7.794 - 8.325 - 16.119
Assebroek: 9.353 - 9.988 - 19.341
Zeebrugge: 1.980 - 1.906 - 3.886
Zwankendamme: 387 - 337 - 724
Dudzele: 1.290 - 1.274 - 2.564
Lissewege: 1.237 - 1.216 - 2.453

TOTAAL in 2006: 56.585 - 60.393 - 116.978
in procent uitgedrukt: 48,37% - 51,63% - 100,00%
(http://www.brugge.be/internet/nl/Bewone ... ijfers.htm)

As I understand this it means Brugge is the sum of all this (maybe just administrational) "sublocations", as it sums up to the total population of Brugge (116.978) and the total city area of 138,40 km², is governed by the same mayor, etc.

Is that right?

knospe · Post by **knospe** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:21 pm

knospe wrote:
Ord€p wrote:
knospe wrote:While you are at it: 1708 Alcântara, 15796 Campo Grande, 122965 Carnide, 17512 Charneca, 141627 Encarnação, 57126 Lumiar, 126864 Santa Catarina, 87950 São domingos de benfica, 18898 São Mamede and 87996 São Vicente de Fora belong to Lisboa, too. Please merge.

"Alvalade (1700)" subsumed under 2981 Alvalade
"Madalena (1100)" subsumed under 130637 Madalena
"Santo estêvão (1100)" subsumed under 87488 Santo Estêvão
"St.estêvão (1100)" subsumed under 98546 St.estêvão
are parts of Lisboa, too. Please demerge and merge with Lisboa.

Ord€p (Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:34 pm) wrote:Please merge:
Belém Lisboa
Benfica Lisboa
Marvila Lisboa
As you can see here and here these "cities" are "parishes" in Lisboa. Please merge all of them to Lisboa.

Mr Euro wrote:This is a good example of what should be posted:
Then at least do that.
knospe wrote:Mariakerke (ID 58619) (only with zip codes 9000 and 9030), Mariakerke (gent) (ID 58620), Mariakerke gent (ID 58624), Mariakerke(gent) (ID 58626), Mariakerke/gent (ID 58628)

knospe wrote:Gent (oostakker) (ID 31121), Oostakker (ID 71377)

knospe wrote:Mariakerke (oostende) (ID 58621), Mariakerke - oostende (ID 58622), Mariakerke / oostende (ID 58623), Mariakerke oostende (ID 58625), Mariakerke(oostende) (ID 58627), Mariakerke/oostende (ID 58629)
new:

Fra (ID 146300) Mörfelden-Walldorf
München-Neuhausen (ID 146299) München
Kt Andreasberg (ID 146293) Sankt Andreasberg (ID 86552)
Frankfurt am Main Hoechst (ID 146284), Frankfurt am Main Sued (ID 146283): Frankfurt am Main
Frankfurt/Main-Flughafen (ID 146285) Flughafen Frankfurt am Main (ID 28668)

Can we do THIS now? We got a user from Portugal requesting the Lisboa-merge, a user from Belgium approveing the merge for that belgian profiles and we got, myself, as German user asking for a merge of some German cities.

This should keep the conditions of the City-merging-requests-just-for-your-own-damn-Country-rule, doesn't it?

knospe · Post by **knospe** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:27 pm

reminder

knospe wrote: 145735 Mals im Vinschgau 58102 Malles Venosta / Mals (zip codes, google maps)

reminder:

109465 Vigo 109463 Vigo Coordinates from EBT, A=109465 Vigo & B=109463 Vigo
131133 Otopeni - Airport Aeroportul Internaţional Henri Coandă Bucharest (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Coan ... al_Airport) but there's also a city named Otopeni, so split the profile if necessary (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otopeni)
105334 Torre - Serra da Estrela 91026 Seia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torre_%28S ... Estrela%29)
107837 Azóia - Sintra 5764 Azóia (coordinates in EBT point there, zip code does too)
25814 Ervedal da beira Ervedal (Oliveira do Hospital) Wikipedia
52452 Las 52470 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Google Maps (EBT coordinates of 52452 Las)

+ some simple renameing to do in http://www.eurobilltrackerforum.com/vie ... 127#565127

knospe wrote:Please merge.
98547 St.estêvão das galés and 101946 Sto estêvão das galés 96365 Santo Estêvão das Galés
101945 Sto estêvão and 98546 St.estêvão 87488 Santo Estêvão
128739 São Miguel Açores (zip code 9500) 75858 Ponta Delgada (São Miguel)

yli · Post by **yli** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:14 pm

knospe wrote:This should keep the conditions of the City-merging-requests-just-for-your-own-damn-Country-rule, doesn't it?

I agree, the merging operation can be different for each country.

Although Belgium is not my-own-damn-Country, and try to answer the Brugge question (without checking wikipedia

)

In the city of Brugge only 19.688 people live ("Brugge-Center"), but in the municipality a total of 116.978

The other names are part-municipalties of Brugge and have been independent municipalities in the past (I think it was the 1976 municipality reform).

Mr Euro · Post by **Mr Euro** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:46 pm

If that was a request to merge Brugge complete, that's absolute NO NO NO.

The other request which are "City-merging-requests-just-for-your-own-damn-Country-rule" are fine by me. Please note that I personally against merging Lissabon to one big city and that this is not accordingly this topics existence, but go ahead.

knospe · Post by **knospe** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:59 pm

Mr Euro wrote:If that was a request to merge Brugge complete, that's absolute NO NO NO.

It was NOT.

knospe wrote:Just out of curiosity:

bhoeyb NLI wrote:and you know that! So why asking??

And I just quote bhoeyb here, eventhough he didn't say it regarding this matter.

knospe · Post by **knospe** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:25 pm

btt

Mezzana (ID 61192)

split in Mezzana, TN (38020) and Mezzana, PI (56010)

Adorf (ID 125572), Benkhausen (ID 9116), Deisfeld (ID 20722), Flechtdorf (ID 27874), Giebringhausen (ID 31502), Herinhousen (ID 146277), Heringhausen (ID 39287) (just zip code 34519), Ottlar (ID 72270), Rhenegge (ID 79878), Schweinsbühl (ID 90663), Schweinsbuehl (ID 90665), Stormbruch (ID 102186), Sudeck (ID 102761), Vasbeck (ID 108429), Wirmighausen (ID 115212)

Diemelsee (ID 21318) http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diemelsee_ ... gliederung

Heringhausen (ID 39287) (just zip code 59909), Berlar (ID 9635), Föckinghausen (ID 26923), Nuttlar (ID 69109), Ostwig (ID 72165), Ramsbeck (ID 78042), Untervalme (ID 107436), Obervalme (ID 70368)

Bestwig (ID 10096) http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestwig#Gemeindegliederung

magpie · Post by **magpie** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:34 pm

knospe wrote:btt

Mezzana (ID 61192) split in Mezzana, TN (38020) and Mezzana, PI (56010)

Mezzana - frazione di San Giuliano Terme, comune in provincia di Pisa.

Ord€p · Post by **Ord€p** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:49 pm

Mr Euro wrote:Please note that I personally against merging Lissabon to one big city and that this is not accordingly this topics existence, but go ahead.

I'm not asking to merge Lissabon to one big city. Lissabon is a big city and Benfica, Belem, Marvila and others aren't cities not even villages. They are neighbourhoods in Lissabon just like, i'd mencioned before, Raval in Barcelona, Chelsea in London and Mitte in Berlin.

Mr Euro · Post by **Mr Euro** » Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:49 am

Ord€p wrote:
Mr Euro wrote:Please note that I personally against merging Lissabon to one big city and that this is not accordingly this topics existence, but go ahead.
I'm not asking to merge Lissabon to one big city. Lissabon is a big city and Benfica, Belem, Marvila and others aren't cities not even villages. They are neighbourhoods in Lissabon just like, i'd mencioned before, Raval in Barcelona, Chelsea in London and Mitte in Berlin.

Even if they are neighbourhoods, I'm against it. But now we have the "City-merging-requests-just-for-your-own-damn-Country-rule", so go ahead

Dakkus · Post by **Dakkus** » Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:00 pm

bhoeyb NLI wrote:
Dakkus wrote:If I understand you correctly, you think that if someone enters notes using "Tiergarten" as a city name instead of "Berlin", those notes should remain separate from the rest of the Berlin notes.
Is this how you think about it?
No Dakkus, this is NOT what Mr Euro or me tries to say, and you know that! So why asking??

I am unable to find any logic behind what Mr Euro is saying. I figure the way I thought Mr Euro /might/ have meant it is a bit pointless, but since I was not able to come to any better conclusion, I decided to make the question of mine.
I will now read the thread further, trying to figure out what Mr Euro is talking about. But if I was incorrect with my guess, I would of course ask that Mr Euro bestätiges that I my guess was wrong.