Suspicious notes and users

Crossmaster · Post by **Crossmaster** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:12 am

well done and thanks for cleaning

Ord€p · Post by **Ord€p** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:45 am

Once again, from P.Damasceno:

2009-02-01 22:48:04 Mxxxx8066xxx (*) Uxxxxx S. Romao Coronado ( Portugal, 4745-515)
2009-02-01 22:47:52 Mxxxx8066xxx Uxxxxx S. Romao Coronado ( Portugal, 4745-515)
2009-02-01 22:47:40 Mxxxx8066xxx Uxxxxx S. Romao Coronado ( Portugal, 4745-515)
2009-02-01 22:47:27 Mxxxx8066xxx Uxxxxx S. Romao Coronado ( Portugal, 4745-515)
2009-02-01 22:47:14 Mxxxx8066xxx Uxxxxx S. Romao Coronado ( Portugal, 4745-515)
2009-02-01 22:46:56 Mxxxx8066xxx Uxxxxx S. Romao Coronado ( Portugal, 4745-515)
2009-02-01 22:46:45 Mxxxx8066xxx Uxxxxx S. Romao Coronado ( Portugal, 4745-515)
2009-02-01 22:46:33 Mxxxx8066xxx Uxxxxx S. Romao Coronado ( Portugal, 4745-515)
2009-02-01 22:46:21 Mxxxx8066xxx Uxxxxx S. Romao Coronado ( Portugal, 4745-515)

-STAR- · Post by **-STAR-** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:30 am

Phaseolus wrote:vtm 85.000 bills

And the rest of the ~30.000 notes are OK?

Can't believe that...

Phaseolus wrote:our vacuum cleaner needs reloading... You'll hear from us tomorrow...

Hopefully it's only the full dust bag that needs to be replaced.

Thanks for the cleaning job and keep up the good work!
Rgds, Franz

Mr Euro · Post by **Mr Euro** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:35 am

@all

Thanks for the support of the cleaning up done by the WG database. Though I must ask for patience. You can not expect that all fake notes/users will be deleted out of our database within a week. The removal of fake bills/users needs the approval of 3 "cleaningladies"

and a head "cleaninglady"

. If you think this is rather complex and not workable, you are wrong. All the people involved are very active ebters, so it can go fast. The tool is just implemented a week ago and there is already result! So there is no need to push for certain names to get rid of. They all will get what they deserved! Just for info: At this moment there are about 70 cases which are investigated. But don't worry, all the onces mentioned in this thread will be a case sooner or later.

Thanks for the support!

Henk Draijer · Post by **Henk Draijer** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:37 am

Good work by the cleaning team

Phaseolus · Post by **Phaseolus** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:13 am

The cleaning team, morning session :

mirkin :15 notes
Fred128 : 1759 notes

As MrEuro explained there's a dual system which links requirements for efficacy and for security (protection of the database).

The Board wanted a system that did not grant full access to the data to a few users. So we separate the job.

packbell · Post by **packbell** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:11 am

Good work by the cleaning team

jabosa2 · Post by **jabosa2** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:11 am

packbell wrote:Good work by the cleaning team

I agree with Packbell

SUp3rFM · Post by **SUp3rFM** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:24 am

If the offender insists in filling the DB with fake notes, you're considering closing their account, right?

Mr Euro · Post by **Mr Euro** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:31 am

SUp3rFM wrote:If the offender insists in filling the DB with fake notes, you're considering closing their account, right?

There are procedures which are in place. You must understand that we can't explain all into the open. Otherwise it would be easy for the fakers to adapt.

The maingoal of the workgroup Database is to get a overall clean database.

I hopes this answers your question

Vildou · Post by **Vildou** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:08 pm

Phaseolus wrote:The cleaning team, morning session :

mirkin :15 notes
Fred128 : 1759 notes

As MrEuro explained there's a dual system which links requirements for efficacy and for security (protection of the database).

The Board wanted a system that did not grant full access to the data to a few users. So we separate the job.

I AM JUMPING ALL OVER THE PLACE!!!

SUp3rFM · Post by **SUp3rFM** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:19 pm

Mr Euro wrote:
SUp3rFM wrote:If the offender insists in filling the DB with fake notes, you're considering closing their account, right?
There are procedures which are in place. You must understand that we can't explain all into the open. Otherwise it would be easy for the fakers to adapt.

The maingoal of the workgroup Database is to get a overall clean database.

I hopes this answers your question

Yes. Even though I had more questions about it, it's VERY GOOD to know that you guys are working hard on that.

It's in fact, all what I wanted to know. Please, keep it up.

pipocadoce · Post by **pipocadoce** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:41 pm

Crazy Bob wrote:
Phaseolus wrote:The cleaning girls are proud to announce the following actions :

Good work by the cleaning girls !

Hopefully loeheu, gerenanja, LDD, AMBIORIX, vtm, P.Damasceno, Reason, LOVE, and all other fakers are next!

Also Ruben_Cruz_017.
Good work!!

starcapitan · Post by **starcapitan** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:05 pm

These hits are suspicious -->> three , same users , same time :
http://en.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=58222247
http://en.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=58316636
http://en.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=58272088

packbell · Post by **packbell** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:33 pm

Hit in serie R€@SØN

2009-02-02 16:22:30 20 EURXxxxx2165xxx (*) Pxxxxx Porto ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 4200)
2009-02-02 16:22:30 20 EURXxxxx2165xxx Pxxxxx Porto ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 4200)
2009-02-02 16:22:30 20 EURXxxxx2165xxx Pxxxxx Porto ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 4200)
2009-02-02 16:22:30 20 EURXxxxx2165xxx Pxxxxx Porto ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 4200)

EuroBillTracker

Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users