Suspicious notes and users

Robick · Post by **Robick** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 2:25 am

Phaseolus wrote:pulga : 342 notes

Thanks Girls

luc4mz · Post by **luc4mz** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:58 pm

2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:36:21 Xxxxx4219xxx Pxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx (*) Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800) <----- IMPOSSIBLE

(http://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=59431077" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)

2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9402xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)
2009-06-27 19:34:19 Nxxxx9401xxx Fxxxxx Kalisz ( Polonia, 62-800)

JRR · Post by **JRR** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:24 pm

Strange hit between bren_nmgn and Horus69.
Both users are from Nijmegen in the Netherlands and Horus69 finds the bill in Spain only one day after bren_nmgn entered the note in Nijmegen.
Horus69 probably enters the location where he spends the bill, but I'm sure the note travelled with him on the plane from the Netherlands I think.
I don't say it's a fake hit, but the location should be changed.

bren_nmgn · Post by **bren_nmgn** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:38 pm

JRR wrote:Strange hit between bren_nmgn and Horus69.
Both users are from Nijmegen in the Netherlands and Horus69 finds the bill in Spain only one day after bren_nmgn entered the note in Nijmegen.
Horus69 probably enters the location where he spends the bill, but I'm sure the note travelled with him on the plane from the Netherlands I think.
I don't say it's a fake hit, but the location should be changed.

JRR, lees ff mijn post in het topic: wat een ellende, want ook ik begrijp hier helemaal niks van.....
ik ben in ieder geval ONSCHULDIG!
ik ken de hele HORUS69 niet, ken geen enkele andere EBT-er as a matter of fact!
toch fijn, dat ik meteen in dit topic vermeld wordt. dank je wel.

TRANSLATION:
i already posted about this hit in the dutch forum, cause i don't understand it either!
i'm in all ways INNOCENT!
i've never met this HORUS69, don't know any other EBT-tracker as a matter of fact!

vermeer · Post by **vermeer** » Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:56 pm

Maybe (s)he really got the banknote, but not in Spain, but just in Nijmegen.

There is no such a place in Spain. The more correct town is Grifeu. This is a town located 5 kilometers from the France/Spain-border directly at the Mediterrenean Sea.

@bren_nmgn: IME you do not need to explain any/something.

Mr Euro · Post by **Mr Euro** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:51 am

JRR wrote:Strange hit between bren_nmgn and Horus69.
Both users are from Nijmegen in the Netherlands and Horus69 finds the bill in Spain only one day after bren_nmgn entered the note in Nijmegen.
Horus69 probably enters the location where he spends the bill, but I'm sure the note travelled with him on the plane from the Netherlands I think.
I don't say it's a fake hit, but the location should be changed.

The location to enter is not the location where you spend it, but the location where you got the bill.

I don't see anything wrong with this hit. Typical vacationhit. Person A received the note while on vacation, person A travelled back to hometown and then person A enters all his notes received during vacation and the note get found real quick by person B. In theory there is more than one day between the two users, but due to entering days, it is just one day. Nothing wrong with that. Not even locationfaking.

-flop- · Post by **-flop-** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:26 am

Mr Euro wrote:
JRR wrote:Strange hit between bren_nmgn and Horus69.
Both users are from Nijmegen in the Netherlands and Horus69 finds the bill in Spain only one day after bren_nmgn entered the note in Nijmegen.
Horus69 probably enters the location where he spends the bill, but I'm sure the note travelled with him on the plane from the Netherlands I think.
I don't say it's a fake hit, but the location should be changed.
The location to enter is not the location where you spend it, but the location where you got the bill.

I don't see anything wrong with this hit. Typical vacationhit. Person A received the note while on vacation, person A travelled back to hometown and then person A enters all his notes received during vacation and the note get found real quick by person B. In theory there is more than one day between the two users, but due to entering days, it is just one day. Nothing wrong with that. Not even locationfaking.

This could be an explanation if a spanish note was found in Holland, but in this case as far as I can see the travel has been inverse.
Difficult to explain.

Mr Euro · Post by **Mr Euro** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:33 am

-flop- wrote:
Mr Euro wrote:
JRR wrote:Strange hit between bren_nmgn and Horus69.
Both users are from Nijmegen in the Netherlands and Horus69 finds the bill in Spain only one day after bren_nmgn entered the note in Nijmegen.
Horus69 probably enters the location where he spends the bill, but I'm sure the note travelled with him on the plane from the Netherlands I think.
I don't say it's a fake hit, but the location should be changed.
The location to enter is not the location where you spend it, but the location where you got the bill.

I don't see anything wrong with this hit. Typical vacationhit. Person A received the note while on vacation, person A travelled back to hometown and then person A enters all his notes received during vacation and the note get found real quick by person B. In theory there is more than one day between the two users, but due to entering days, it is just one day. Nothing wrong with that. Not even locationfaking.
This could be an explanation if a spanish note was found in Holland, but in this case as far as I can see the travel has been inverse.
Difficult to explain.

Not that difficult to explain. Person A enters his during vacation received notes a week after coming back of vacation, but spend the bill on day 1 after returning to his hometown. Person B enters it immediatly after receiving the note. It happens. Clearly vacationhit. No need to worry.

bren_nmgn · Post by **bren_nmgn** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:35 am

-flop- wrote:
Mr Euro wrote:
JRR wrote:Strange hit between bren_nmgn and Horus69.
Both users are from Nijmegen in the Netherlands and Horus69 finds the bill in Spain only one day after bren_nmgn entered the note in Nijmegen.
Horus69 probably enters the location where he spends the bill, but I'm sure the note travelled with him on the plane from the Netherlands I think.
I don't say it's a fake hit, but the location should be changed.
The location to enter is not the location where you spend it, but the location where you got the bill.

I don't see anything wrong with this hit. Typical vacationhit. Person A received the note while on vacation, person A travelled back to hometown and then person A enters all his notes received during vacation and the note get found real quick by person B. In theory there is more than one day between the two users, but due to entering days, it is just one day. Nothing wrong with that. Not even locationfaking.
This could be an explanation if a spanish note was found in Holland, but in this case as far as I can see the travel has been inverse.
Difficult to explain.

nothing difficult about it!!!
i got the note in a store in nijmegen, entered it, and spend it again in another shop.
my guess is that Horus69 took some cash with him on holiday from nijmegen to spain, including that specific note!
why he entered it as found in spain, even though it's theoratically possible, i don't know, and don't like it either!!!!
in fact, don't like my name being mentioned in this topic AT ALL.

De-Ker · Post by **De-Ker** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:43 am

bren_nmgn wrote:
-flop- wrote:
Mr Euro wrote:
JRR wrote:Strange hit between bren_nmgn and Horus69.
Both users are from Nijmegen in the Netherlands and Horus69 finds the bill in Spain only one day after bren_nmgn entered the note in Nijmegen.
Horus69 probably enters the location where he spends the bill, but I'm sure the note travelled with him on the plane from the Netherlands I think.
I don't say it's a fake hit, but the location should be changed.
The location to enter is not the location where you spend it, but the location where you got the bill.

I don't see anything wrong with this hit. Typical vacationhit. Person A received the note while on vacation, person A travelled back to hometown and then person A enters all his notes received during vacation and the note get found real quick by person B. In theory there is more than one day between the two users, but due to entering days, it is just one day. Nothing wrong with that. Not even locationfaking.
This could be an explanation if a spanish note was found in Holland, but in this case as far as I can see the travel has been inverse.
Difficult to explain.
nothing difficult about it!!!
i got the note in a store in nijmegen, entered it, and spend it again in another shop.
my guess is that Horus69 took some cash with him on holiday from nijmegen to spain, including that specific note!
why he entered it as found in spain, even though it's theoratically possible, i don't know, and don't like it either!!!!
in fact, don't like my name being mentioned in this topic AT ALL.

Mr euro tried to explain already.

first of all. you didn't do anything wrong

but perhaps horus was 2 weeks on vacation.. had no possibilty to enter the note so he did a few days after when he came back.

so you found it earlier then him who found the note a week (or 2 or so) back in spain.

the hit should be spain to netherlands and not (how it is now) the other way around. But it's clear that horus took this note with him, went to the kruidvat and you found it there.

-flop- · Post by **-flop-** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:09 am

Well, as far as I can understand we can have two possibilities:

my guess is that Horus69 took some cash with him on holiday from nijmegen to spain, including that specific note!
why he entered it as found in spain, even though it's theoratically possible, i don't know, and don't like it either!!!!

In this case we'd be talking about a fake location.

Person A enters his during vacation received notes a week after coming back of vacation, but spend the bill on day 1 after returning to his hometown. Person B enters it immediatly after receiving the note.

In this case we cannot talk about any fake but simply an infringement of the guideline suggesting to enter notes in a short time since we had them and possibly before spending them in order to avoid "reverse hits".

In both cases this hit represents an error in statistics and does not describe the real travel of the note.
I wrote that travel of the note from Holland to Spain was difficult to explain and so is.
This travel has probably never been done.

ravestorm · Post by **ravestorm** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:34 pm

Another case of fake locations, this time by Nyrstar.
According with comment fields these notes are from Belgium and not from Iceland so they must be entered from the 1st country i mentioned (according with EBT guidelines)

2009-06-23 16:14:40 5 EURVxxxx8044xxx Mxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-23 16:13:57 5 EURUxxxx1892xxx Lxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-23 16:13:57 5 EURVxxxx7770xxx Mxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-23 16:11:58 5 EURUxxxx5679xxx Lxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-23 16:11:58 5 EURUxxxx2340xxx Lxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-23 16:07:32 5 EURUxxxx7918xxx Lxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-23 16:07:32 5 EURVxxxx0367xxx Mxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-23 16:05:23 5 EURUxxxx5033xxx Lxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-23 16:03:35 5 EURXxxxx6412xxx Pxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-23 16:03:35 5 EURVxxxx7532xxx Mxxxxx Reykjavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
2009-06-02 09:57:40 5 EURUxxxx3504xxx Lxxxxx Reykjavík ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 101)
.....

2009-05-18 19:32:40 5 EURXxxxx1629xxx Pxxxxx Höfn ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 780)
2009-05-18 19:32:40 5 EURXxxxx1629xxx Pxxxxx Höfn ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 780)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1629xxx Pxxxxx Höfn ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 780)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Höfn ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 780)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Höfn ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 780)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Höfn ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 780)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Höfn ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 780)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Höfn ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 780)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Höfn ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 780)
.....

2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:31:33 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
.....

2009-05-18 19:30:27 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:30:27 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:30:27 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:30:27 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:30:27 5 EURXxxxx1627xxx Pxxxxx Akureyri ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 600)
2009-05-18 19:29:29 5 EURXxxxx1626xxx Pxxxxx Keflavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 230)
2009-05-18 19:29:29 5 EURXxxxx1626xxx Pxxxxx Keflavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 230)
2009-05-18 19:29:29 5 EURXxxxx1626xxx Pxxxxx Keflavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 230)
2009-05-18 19:29:29 5 EURXxxxx1626xxx Pxxxxx Keflavik ( Flag for Islanda Islanda, 230)
.....

Phaseolus · Post by **Phaseolus** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:14 pm

Perescal : 3657 notes

Robick · Post by **Robick** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:24 pm

Phaseolus wrote:Perescal : 3657 notes

God Job/Bon Travail/Bom Trabalho

Today, the user P u l g a again.

2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:09:58 Mxxxx5303xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Portugal, 3810)

And V i l i n h a s Humm! is very suspicious.

CarlosManta · Post by **CarlosManta** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:03 pm

Hit into series. pulga, again, and... me

2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx(*) Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)
2009-06-28 16:57:05 5 EURMxxxx5301xxx Uxxxxx Aveiro ( Flag for Portugal Portugal, 3810)

EuroBillTracker

Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users