Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

yli · Post by **yli** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:36 pm

Fons wrote:
Crazy Bob wrote:This one should be merged with the main Hengelo profile.

No!
It are 2 very different places!! (also the small village Hengelo has it's own official place name sign, it shouldn't even be counted to Bronckhorst)

In fact Hengelo (Gelderland) is now part of the municipality of Bronckhorst (before 2005 it was an independent municipality)

Fons · Post by **Fons** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:47 pm

No

I have been there earlier this year, and there's an official blue road sign!

yli · Post by **yli** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:58 pm

EDIT: I am not saying Hengelo doesn't exists

Fons · Post by **Fons** » Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:47 pm

yli wrote:EDIT: I am not saying Hengelo doesn't exists

whoops, sorry

I didn't saw you were talking about municipalities

magpie · Post by **magpie** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:15 pm

12167 berlin (ID 218)

Berlin (ID 9700)
16227 eberswalde (ID 221)

Eberswalde (ID 23349)
59079 Hamm (ID 274)

Hamm (Westfalen) (ID 36350)
Erwittte (ID 25820)

Erwitte (ID 25818)
Erwitte-Horn (ID 25819)

Erwitte (ID 25818)
Please delete Meisenheiim (ID 60531) it's a misspelled place name with no bills and no users.

lazza · Post by **lazza** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:07 am

Let me just say firstly that this is not urgent, as I am the only person entering notes in this location (not surprisingly!), but I have entered a few notes in the small town where I live over the last couple of months (I discovered that our Post Office has a small foreign exchange counter), but the location does not have a dot yet.

The place is West Monkseaton, NE25

, and the coordinates are Lat: 55:02:20N Lon: 1:28:30W

Hope this helps.

Fons · Post by **Fons** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:39 pm

"Hollum" has to be added to "Hollum (ameland)" and "Hollum Ameland"
(the last two were already added together)

http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=41490
http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=41491

magpie · Post by **magpie** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:22 pm

Feldkirchen-W. (ID 122494)

Feldkirchen-Westerham (ID 27202)

Crazy Bob · Post by **Crazy Bob** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:30 pm

I assume this "city" and the bills entered there should be changed to Groningen.

daniellez · Post by **daniellez** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:50 am

This city should be put in its original profile

http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=117547

Zutphen is in Holland, not in Sweden

ravestorm · Post by **ravestorm** » Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:28 pm

This note should be placed in Vatican City

, not in Italy

http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/index.php ... d=23803020

JP Simões · Post by **JP Simões** » Fri Nov 24, 2006 10:48 pm

Aucamvile
Aucamville
Aucamvlle

are one and the same.

knospe · Post by **knospe** » Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:38 pm

116214 "Wutha farnroda" should be "Wutha-Farnroda"

daniellez · Post by **daniellez** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:11 pm

I've looked at the USA

86112 (San Francisco) and 86115 (San Francisco, California) are the same city

74476 (Philadelphia, pa) and 74475 (Philadelphia) are the same city

83287 (Sacramento) and 83288 (Sacramento, ca) are the same city

JP Simões · Post by **JP Simões** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:16 pm

daniellez wrote:86112 (San Francisco) and 86115 (San Francisco, California) are the same city

Also 86114 (San francisco, ca).

Sao Paulo (87547) should be named São Paulo.