Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5

User avatar
de*lerger
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5315
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Lies - Terschelling (NL)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by de*lerger »

ravestorm wrote: btw there's a typo, it's Biancavilla instead of Biancaville (that sounds French :wink: )
:oops: changed it

Also found the other missing dot: Ponte Novu on Corsica, 42,4833, 9,2833
(and I know it's usually written as Ponte Nuovo, but I just used the name that's on the village sign and the railroad station :wink: )
My map
User avatar
androl
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: München (Myeenack, Mjuncken), Deutschland (Chairmany, Djutschländ)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by androl »

yli wrote:
googlejaps wrote:I use another method to determine if something is a seperate village or a suburb. I take a look at googlemaps
I don't really trust the GooleMaps maps.
you can trust Google Maps 100% about whether there is a "natural separation" between two named settlements, just look at the satellite images 8)
but the question here is, what is a "city profile"? If you define city profiles in your countries by naturally separated villages, there will always be problems and incertain cases. How many meters of grassland must be between two settlements to get their own city profiles? If you don't trust Google Maps, how else do you define villages?
Joshu, a Chinese Zen master, asked a cow:
"Do you have Buddha-nature or not?"
The cow answered: "Moo."
User avatar
yli
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5870
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:34 am
Location: TILBURG
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by yli »

I use viamichelin, a much better map - including borders of villages
Jelle zonder internet. Het was een leuke hobby, maar niet mijn hobby. Een leven zonder internet is mijn ding. Een leven van geld uitgeven in plaats van tracken zeg maar.... hahaha. Ja, er mag gelachen worden.
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten :lol:
User avatar
androl
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: München (Myeenack, Mjuncken), Deutschland (Chairmany, Djutschländ)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by androl »

yli wrote:including borders of villages
"villages" have borders? I see the borders, but what is it what you see there? In Germany it is the Gemeinden. In the Netherlands I don't know. Stiphout (gemeente until 1968) is part of Helmond, but Lieshout, Aarle-Rixtel and Beek en Donk (gemeentes until 1997, now gemeente Laarbeek) are separate. I think there is no official level below gemeentes in the Netherlands. Could it be that viamichelin is out of date?
There are countries that use the official lowest-level structures with defined borders for the city profiles, while other countries seem to use "villages" without clear area, depending on names, road signs, meters of grassland or sense. In Belgium, the municipalities will be one of the new to-be-created subdivisions on EBT. How do you represent the gemeentes in the Netherlands?
Joshu, a Chinese Zen master, asked a cow:
"Do you have Buddha-nature or not?"
The cow answered: "Moo."
User avatar
claudio vda
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 9124
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: Bremen (DE) + Pisa (IT)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by claudio vda »

Hallo! There is a location missing :wink:

Monteroni d'Arbia (a municipality in the department of Siena, Italy), zip code = 53014
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=62793" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Coordinates of Monteroni d'Arbia are 43°13' 46" N ; 11° 25' 20" E

Many thanks! :P
My statistics on EBTCHECK (Latest update 13.08.2026 )
User avatar
R/J
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2300
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 12:04 pm
Location: Eindhoven & omgeving, Nederland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by R/J »

androl wrote:while other countries seem to use "villages" without clear area, depending on names, road signs, meters of grassland or sense.
I think yli is referring to determining to what village the rural areas 'belong'. The villages themselves are generally indicated very clearly (with signs like these), but there is generally no sign in the rural area to indicate you are moving from one village to the other.
My NIG stats have finally disappeared. My EBTST stats are still available.
User avatar
yli
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5870
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:34 am
Location: TILBURG
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by yli »

I entered some new locations in Luxembourg this weekend :

:flag-lu: 9378 Friidhaff 49.88598,6.136723
(municipality Diekirch - kanton Diekirch - district Diekirch)
:flag-lu: 9366 Neimillen 49.838522,6.224742
(municipality Ermsdorf - kanton Diekirch - district Diekirch)
:flag-lu: 7440 Lintgen 49.722385,6.124256
(municipality Lintgen - kanton Mersch - district Luxembourg)
:flag-lu: 4994 Schouweiler 49.580014,5.957315
(municipality Dippach - kanton Capellen - district Luxembourg)
:flag-lu: 9144 Hierheck 49.873958,5.9303
(minicipality Heiderscheid - kanton Wiltz - district Diekirch)

I don't want to continue the GoogleMaps discussion, but R/J was right. For determine rural areas (and petrolstations at the highway) it's impossible to use GoogleMaps. And sometimes even the other side of the street can be an other place, like in :flag-lu: Platen / :flag-lu: Bettborn were I was last weekend.
Jelle zonder internet. Het was een leuke hobby, maar niet mijn hobby. Een leven zonder internet is mijn ding. Een leven van geld uitgeven in plaats van tracken zeg maar.... hahaha. Ja, er mag gelachen worden.
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten :lol:
User avatar
claudio vda
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 9124
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: Bremen (DE) + Pisa (IT)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by claudio vda »

claudio vda wrote:Hallo! There is a location missing
Now it is ok. Thanks! :mrgreen:
My statistics on EBTCHECK (Latest update 13.08.2026 )
User avatar
groentje
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3014
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: Brussels Capital Region, Belgium

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by groentje »

R/J wrote:
androl wrote:while other countries seem to use "villages" without clear area, depending on names, road signs, meters of grassland or sense.
I think yli is referring to determining to what village the rural areas 'belong'. The villages themselves are generally indicated very clearly (with signs like these), but there is generally no sign in the rural area to indicate you are moving from one village to the other.
In Belgium, often there is, the red lined, yellow plates with the name of the village (and to wich municipality it belongs) in black. These plates are on the (former) municipality borders.
User avatar
androl
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: München (Myeenack, Mjuncken), Deutschland (Chairmany, Djutschländ)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by androl »

R/J wrote:I think yli is referring to determining to what village the rural areas 'belong'. The villages themselves are generally indicated very clearly (with signs like these), but there is generally no sign in the rural area to indicate you are moving from one village to the other.
I use the word "village" or "settlement" for a group of houses and streets that have road signs like you mention at the beginning and at the end, but that do not have a defined rural area around them with borders. A defined area with borders, that normally has a village or a city with the same name in the center, but can also have two or more villages, like you see at viamichelin, is something administrative, it can be called gemeente (nl), Gemeinde (de,at), municipality, naselje (si), anything.
In the rural area, you are not in a village, but you are in an area belonging to an administrative unit. I just wanted to ask, if yli says that Dutch city profiles are representing the units that you see at viamichelin (do they? do you have any rules at all, or am I entering "new land" with my questions?), what these areas actually are.
In Germany we use the Gemeinden for city profiles. Often, in some areas, Gemeinden usually have several villages in them and are only an administrative thing, while in other areas, Gemeinden are 1:1 with villages.
Joshu, a Chinese Zen master, asked a cow:
"Do you have Buddha-nature or not?"
The cow answered: "Moo."
User avatar
yli
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5870
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:34 am
Location: TILBURG
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by yli »

It's getting totally off-topic. But there aren't any specific rules. The municipalities in The Netherlands can make their own desission to put blue or white road signs marking a city, town or village.
Jelle zonder internet. Het was een leuke hobby, maar niet mijn hobby. Een leven zonder internet is mijn ding. Een leven van geld uitgeven in plaats van tracken zeg maar.... hahaha. Ja, er mag gelachen worden.
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten :lol:
User avatar
groentje
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3014
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: Brussels Capital Region, Belgium

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by groentje »

In the Netherlands, as well as in Belgium, houses such as farms that are not inside the village, still belong to a very distinct place, you can call it a village, or a 'deelgemeente' in Dutch, and mostly, it's a former municipality that merged with other former municipalities in a new one. Borders aren't always very clear, but mostly, you will find a name sign at the border.
User avatar
androl
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: München (Myeenack, Mjuncken), Deutschland (Chairmany, Djutschländ)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by androl »

yli wrote:It's getting totally off-topic
oh I'm sorry, what could be more off-topic than talking about definition of city profiles in a topic about city profiles? :oops: :o
groentje wrote:deelgemeente' in Dutch, and mostly, it's a former municipality that merged with other former municipalities in a new one
thanks for the explanation,
I think I leave it to you to decide if you want to use deelgemeentes, places with road signs or just one profile for any named settlement :) (as it's of course not my job to tell you anything)
and what exactly Viamichelin is showing - they show more areas than before the formation of Laarbeek in 1997 (as they also show Mariahout which belonged to Lieshout), but less than the profiles on EBT (there are profiles for Keldonkand Boerdonkwhich belong to Erp on Viamichelin, although they are clearly away from Erp) - who cares :)
Joshu, a Chinese Zen master, asked a cow:
"Do you have Buddha-nature or not?"
The cow answered: "Moo."
User avatar
R/J
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2300
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 12:04 pm
Location: Eindhoven & omgeving, Nederland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by R/J »

Could Zeilberg (example note) be unmerged from Deurne? I agree that the situation is somewhat vague, but almost a year ago the community of Deurne has placed blue village signs for Zeilberg. I think this should be enough to qualify for a separate EBT-profile.
My NIG stats have finally disappeared. My EBTST stats are still available.
User avatar
dserrano5
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3772
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:59 am
Location: Madrid, ES

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by dserrano5 »

(Originally posted here). The maps for this hit show a horizontal arrow that comes from the left edge of the image, instead of having the right source (Brasilia).
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”