Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

[googlejaps]

The new location manager sure makes it easy to spot some issues.

See the profile of Peel en Maas

It contains both Baarlo (Limburg) as Baarlo. I guess these two can be (need to be) merged.

[yli]

The new location manager sure makes it easy to spot some issues.

I might be a new location manager, but I mainly did french speaking locations

Anyway profiles are merged

[Kleman]

I also don't know, there was already a profile of Saint-Michel. I put your note of département 16 into that profile.

It might be because you didn't use a - in the location name, just like same spelling of Saint-Michel-sur-Orge.

Thanks Yli !

[Wovychamois]

These 2 "Locca" profiles have to be put together:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=55876" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=55877" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

These 2 "Levico" profiles have to be put together under "Levico Terme":
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=54753" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=54752" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=168164" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; has to be amended in Piazza (Terragnolo). The correct spelling is Terragnolo, not Terragnola.

[Wovychamois]

These 2 "San Marino" profiles have to be put together under "San Marino":
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=168245" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=86219" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[rlaurenssen]

These 2 "San Marino" profiles have to be put together under "San Marino":
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=168245" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=86219" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Done, thanks for noticing.

[androl]

I don't really understand why this note (and this one) was automatically put into this city

not the same name (but close, of course), note the same zipcode...

when there is only one profile with the newly entered city name, the new location will automatically be put into that profile, not regarding the post code. That is especially bad now when all the unused locations in the database have been deleted, there are more cases now where only one location of a place name exists, and when someone enters a note from one of the other places with the same name, the system thinks it is the same place.

Could it be a solution to use this automatic merge only in countries with many different post codes like the Netherlands?
Or only if the name of the location is the same as the name of the profile?

[Wovychamois]

These 2 "Pas de la Casa" profiles have to be put together:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=73185" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=156322" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

These 2 "Kiev" profiles have to be put together:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=46700" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=169552" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

These 2 "Baarle" profiles have to be merged:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=160584" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=6082" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[rlaurenssen]

These 2 "Pas de la Casa" profiles have to be put together:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=73185" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=156322" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

These 2 "Kiev" profiles have to be put together:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=46700" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=169552" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

These 2 "Baarle" profiles have to be merged:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=160584" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=6082" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Pas de le casa and Pas de la Casa are merged.
Kiev seems to be done already
Baarle is indeed a seperate village within the municipality of Baarle-Hertog,
so this will remain this way.

[Zjonbelz]

These 2 "Baarle" profiles have to be merged:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=160584" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=6082" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Baarle is indeed a seperate village within the municipality of Baarle-Hertog,
so this will remain this way.

No, this Baarle is a small community within the municipality of Gent. I entered the only note there. See this link:

http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baarle_(Oost-Vlaanderen)

[Zjonbelz]

Please give Flora it's own profile back, it is a separate village within the municipality of Merelbeke. It has it's own villagesign. Coordinates 51.017642N,3.760414E

Missing dots:

Baarle 51.036645N,3.618279E
't Loo (Bergeijk) 51.308887N,5.337381E
Boshoven 51.254717N,5.679245E
Zeelst 51.424313N,5.415745E
Brachterbeek 51.146833,5.906696E
Reutje 51.128684N,6.008749E
Hedikhuizen 51.733992N,5.185289E

[rlaurenssen]

Please give Flora it's own profile back, it is a separate village within the municipality of Merelbeke. It has it's own villagesign. Coordinates 51.017642N,3.760414E

Missing dots:

Baarle 51.036645N,3.618279E
't Loo (Bergeijk) 51.308887N,5.337381E
Boshoven 51.254717N,5.679245E
Zeelst 51.424313N,5.415745E
Brachterbeek 51.146833,5.906696E
Reutje 51.128684N,6.008749E
Hedikhuizen 51.733992N,5.185289E

Baarle has been added to the municipality of Gent, sorry didn't notice the postal code.

Flora is not a village, its a suburb of the gemeente Merelbeke http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flora_(Merelbeke) so this
wil stay this way.

Also Boshoven has been identified as a suburb of the municipality Weert http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boshoven_(Weert)

The rest of your list has coordinates now and should show up on your Dotmap. I'm really sorry if you lost those two citys from your
list, but a suburb should be merged with the correct City. Villagesigns do not always tell you if it is really a village, a lot of
suburbs, in both the Netherlands and Belguim, have signs at their borders, but can not be identified as a village.

[Tarmo]

The dot for Tampere (post code area 33230) is located in the Norwegian Sea due to an error on the coordinates. 61.4996,3.74252 should be 61.4996,23.74252

[anto989]

I inserted this bill but the dot doesn't appear,and should be above the dot of Otranto

http://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=84314346" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Wovychamois]

These 2 profiles have to be merged:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=74044" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=74043" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;