Suspicious notes and users

Klazu · Post by **Klazu** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:03 pm

Yes, but it's also very frustrating for those hit partners these fakers like romeotango (117 hits) have. One day their "great int. hit" they are proud of just vanishes and they maybe never learn the thruth behind the "hit".

Stefan85 · Post by **Stefan85** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:52 pm

This hit looks quite suspicious:
http://eurobilltracker.eu/index.php?com ... d=20013796

Crazy Bob · Post by **Crazy Bob** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:31 pm

again two users who MUST be connected somehow, just look at their hit lists: u66888 and ct1aic

De Slak · Post by **De Slak** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:24 am

Hits into a serie for zatlap

2007-01-03 11:31:29 Xxxxx4894xxx (*) Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
...
2007-01-03 11:21:09 Xxxxx4894xxx Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
2007-01-03 11:20:57 Xxxxx4894xxx Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
2007-01-03 11:19:04 Xxxxx4894xxx Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
2007-01-03 11:17:59 Xxxxx4894xxx (*) Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
2007-01-03 11:17:23 Xxxxx4894xxx Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)

hailtotheking · Post by **hailtotheking** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:55 am

De Slak wrote:Hits into a serie for zatlap

2007-01-03 11:31:29 Xxxxx4894xxx (*) Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
...
2007-01-03 11:21:09 Xxxxx4894xxx Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
2007-01-03 11:20:57 Xxxxx4894xxx Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
2007-01-03 11:19:04 Xxxxx4894xxx Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
2007-01-03 11:17:59 Xxxxx4894xxx (*) Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)
2007-01-03 11:17:23 Xxxxx4894xxx Pxxxxx Bruxelles ( België, 1083)

Faker meets faker!!!!!!

erasmuston · Post by **erasmuston** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:47 pm

Friendly hits

http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/index.php ... d=25117734
http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/index.php ... d=25085221

Post by **Nerzhul** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:02 pm

Zatlap, 15338 notes
tschaeggi, 5364 notes
idefix68erCorvetteCabrio, 11872 notes

french guest · Post by **french guest** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:47 pm

francois_paris 0 note
chegevara 0 note
cybercl 0 note

but they are BIG FAKER

Phaseolus · Post by **Phaseolus** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:42 pm

french guest wrote:francois_paris 0 note
chegevara 0 note
cybercl 0 note

but they are BIG FAKER

It's a pity that Frencu users have to hide away under the name "guest" in order to transfer again and again this information.

I fully support "french guest" : these three accounts are proven fakers ; thank you in adavnce for your action on these three accounts.

jaibee16 · Post by **jaibee16** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:57 pm

erasmuston wrote:Friendly hits

http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/index.php ... d=25117734
http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/index.php ... d=25085221

I agree !

Post by **Nerzhul** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:40 pm

Phaseolus wrote:It's a pity that Frencu users have to hide away under the name "guest" in order to transfer again and again this information.

I fully support "french guest" : these three accounts are proven fakers ; thank you in adavnce for your action on these three accounts.

Nobody has to "hide" as a guest in order to get a message across. If you have a point to make, please do so, either avij or I will eventually investigate.

But it helps tremendously if this point isn't encoded into a one-liner or a useless message though.

A posting such as

french guest wrote:francois_paris 0 note
chegevara 0 note
cybercl 0 note

but they are BIG FAKER

or the recent ones by Westinghouse will most likely be ignored since they carry little meaning. Instead, politely bring up your point and provide useful information.

What's so difficult about writing a normal message, such as "Hey Nerzhul, while you're at it, please investigate francois_paris. You can find the reason why I suspect him on page 241 of this thread. Thank you in advance, ZOZ".

I don't remember everything that has been posted here nor am I willing to spend my time investigating just because a name's been mentioned in this thread.

€€F · Post by **€€F** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:46 pm

Nerzhul wrote:Zatlap, 15338 notes
tschaeggi, 5364 notes
idefix68erCorvetteCabrio, 11872 notes

great work..

Regarding the remarks Westinghouse made..
I believe in his first post he did mention why it all was suspicious..

Westinghouse wrote:Please remove this , this and this hit.

They are all fake; as is the user from Heerlen. I am not happy.

OK > The info is little but still..
The fact that a user wants hits deleted because they are fake is in my opinion very honest!

Later on , he kept repeating which shouldn't be done..

That's my 2 cents..

Ralf · Post by **Ralf** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:58 pm

Thanks Nerzhul for the big cleaning again

vermeer · Post by **vermeer** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:08 pm

Look at page 366 of this thread and everything is explained by erasmuston at December 16, 2006 at 23:07 for my first 2 hits with the person from Heerlen. Also page 367 on December 19, 2006 at 22:55 for my third "hit" with poepelie; also a remark made by erasmuston.

If this is not clear to the moderator(s) than in future i will retreat from the forum totally and only go off-topic.

€€F · Post by **€€F** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:12 pm

Westinghouse wrote: If this is not clear to the moderator(s) than in future i will retreat from the forum totally and only go off-topic.

I suggest not to try to achieve your goals by pointing out this way , W!

I am in your line, you pointed out your problems with the hits only perhaps not in line with the way nerzhul and/or avij would like to see the info written...

But please remain some calmness.

We're all doing the best we can and I'm sure nerzhul and avij do so!!