(continuation from
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=55118&start=45" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; )
JordiJanTaxi wrote:
First, let me tell you that my "idea" on a small part of a "national area" on banknotes is not "nationalist", as you use it. Bush jr., Aznar and Berlusconi turned the meaning of this word as a synonim of something criminal. But it is not.
Well, I don't care what the politicians think on this matter. My personal opinion is that this idea lends itself easily to a nationalist interpretation, and I attribute to the word a negative connotation as normal for most people.
JordiJanTaxi wrote:Right after I read your post I went see your profile (hobbies): weapons and military strategy. OK. I understand a bit more, now. Maybe you would like to solve what you call "nationalism" with "weapons" via "military strategy"...
No, I'm just planning to conquer the world with weapons and military strategy, I'm just a clerk that "serious and boring (and silly?) as usual" Europe uses to plan it, and after that the world will be united under the European rule will have a worldwide common currency with same graphics for all states.
JordiJanTaxi wrote:No need, see? It is just a comment, and having a small different design that does not affect safety features, and does not affect the general perception of the whole banknote, size, colour, etc, must not be a problem for anybody. Concerning this subject I honestly find your comments ironic to say the least, sarcastic and even rude. What I suggest for the banknotes is not different from what goes on with the coins. Where they are, from one side, TOTALLY different from country to country, or worse, with commemorative mintings, and nobody has become crazy or paranoic about it. Androl has taken most of my idea.
Instead I honestly find your comments excessively polemical for a question with no real importance. However, this idea has already been considered at the beginnings and then abandoned, for reasons already been explained, and the European population doesn't perceive the need for this. I think we should use our time and effort to the most important set of problems rather than complicate the situation with a differentiation of banknotes within the same emitting area.
JordiJanTaxi wrote:As for your comment about the "ages" we know about the subjects depicted on the banknotes, just tell that depicting "classical architecture" does not necessarily mean "again the same archs and bridges". Could have been "classical" but another design, couldn't it? And maybe, some day, subjects depicted in banknotes can be "industries", for example... one, naval, one aeronautic, one spacial, etc.,
Ci vediamo nel forum. Ciao.
We can argue all they want, it's a matter of taste and opinion. But this doesn't justify such surprised-negative reaction, because we already knew what theme would be the same as the first series.
European soul, European pride.