Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5

User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1997
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

I have brushed up my greek (or I found a way to copy and past the translation ;-) )
All the coordinates are in, only for some places are not assigned to a Municipality.
I'm not for sure if every greek Municipality has his unique postcode. If so than I found this:

Kokkinoekklisies :arrow: Kymi-Aliveri
Strofilia :arrow: Mantoudi–Limni–Agia Anna
Nees Pagases :arrow: Volos
Egira :arrow: Aigialeia
Loutra Thermopilou :arrow: Lamia
Please correct me if I'm wrong or give me an OK if I'm right and I take care of it
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 259 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 407
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
User avatar
de*lerger
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5299
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Lies - Terschelling (NL)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by de*lerger »

The Greek part of my map is looking much better now. There's only one white gap left, the Loutraki dot. It’s supposed to be the dot above Korinthos.

The municipalities look OK to me. Seen the names before when looking for postal codes and other info on the various places.

Thanks Burdie (& anyone else involved)
My map
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1997
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

@de*lerger: All done now.

Ik heb de dot van Loutraki nu ook verplaatst. Deze waren al ingevuld en ik wilde niet op iemands teentjes trappen. Ik ben namelijk een leek in griekenland. Ik zie niet dat de dot is verplaatst. Het kan zijn dat de coordinaten in de zelfde dot vallen, Of dat het te maken heeft dat het in de 'catch' is. Het kan ook zijn dat ik toe ben aan een nieuw brilletje :-)
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 259 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 407
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
User avatar
de*lerger
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5299
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Lies - Terschelling (NL)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by de*lerger »

You don't need new glasses Burdie :wink:
The Loutraki coordinates seem to be at the right place now.
My map
User avatar
Nick6502
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3153
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 11:44 pm
Location: Kuurne

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Nick6502 »

Les Gottes

Les Gottes is a hamlet in the village of Strée, part of the municipality of Modave.
Les Gottes is now linked to the village of Outrelouxhe.
So if Les Gottes doesn't get a separate profile (which I could understand), then it should be linked to Strée and not to Outrelouxhe.
Thank you.

Source.
User avatar
LArdennais
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 14224
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:58 am
Location: Quelque part en Ardenne profonde...

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by LArdennais »

Nick6502 wrote:Les Gottes

Les Gottes is a hamlet in the village of Strée, part of the municipality of Modave.
Les Gottes is now linked to the village of Outrelouxhe.
So if Les Gottes doesn't get a separate profile (which I could understand), then it should be linked to Strée and not to Outrelouxhe.
Thank you.

Source.
Please see my 2014's answer for this "only hamlet" . Yes, in 2014, I have personnally called the Modave's municipal administration AND I have personnaly gone to see these two hamlets (which are not far from "my home" ;) ) for finally inputting "Les Gottes" and "Rausa" into the "city" of Outrelouxhe with their own coordinates - and not inputting them into the "city" of Strée, which stays just next to Outrelouxhe.
http://liste.eurobillets.free.fr/ & http://liste.eurobillets.free.fr/index2.htm : don't miss it every day ! à zieuter tous les jours ! kijk elke dag ! :D

https://play.google.com/store/apps/deta ... l=fr&gl=US : A utiliser sans modération ! Use it without moderation ! :)
User avatar
Crazy Bob
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7413
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Crazy Bob »

Newtownbutler :flag-uk: has a dot, but unfortunately in the middle of Russia rather than in Northern Ireland...
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1997
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

Crazy Bob wrote:Newtownbutler :flag-uk: has a dot, but unfortunately in the middle of Russia rather than in Northern Ireland...

What day is it today ;-)

Sorry, my fault. Suddenly the Irish plotter has it bussy, People starting to use the eircode and I try to pinpoint everything. Yesterday it was a little late, but it is now corrected. Hope to see you tomorrow. I try to start my car at 5 O'Clock :-)
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 259 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 407
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
User avatar
Raumi
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 484
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:32 pm
Location: Santiago y Zaraíche - Murcia - Spain
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Raumi »

Let's have a look over Image Peru.

1. Aguas Caliente and Aquas Caliente I understand both refer to Aguas Calientes. It is the main village in Machupicchu district, belonging to Urubamba Province, in Cusco. (Seriously guys, two attempts and zero right :oops: )

2. Machu Picchu, written in two words, is not a town nor a village, but the archaeological site. It should be merged with Aguas Calientes, and perhaps renamed Machupicchu, but most Peruvians prefeer the name Aguas Calientes when talking about the village.

3. Pachacama is also misspelt. Should be Pachacámac. Here there might be some confusion, as Pachacámac could be a district in Lima Province, or an archaeological site. I bet it refers to the second one, so it should be renamed as Lurín since this is the district where the site is. By the way, Lurín belongs to Lima Province.

4. Sacsayhuaman is an archaeological site, not too far away from Cusco, where I find almost impossible to get a euro note. I was there during December 2.014, and there is nothing but big impressive stones and grass. No shops, no exchange offices, no ATMs. So this town sould be merged with Cusco.

5. Santa Anita Belongs to Lima (city province), not to Lima Region. By the way, it would be nice to rename Lima (city province) to Provincia de Lima.

Thank you in advice.
Spanish representative on the Board of Directors.
Current vice president of the Association Européenne des EuroBillTrackers
My statistics.
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1997
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

Raumi wrote:Let's have a look over Image Peru.


It is getting a little bit quieter in Ireland :wink: :wink: so I give it a try.

1. Aguas Caliente and Aquas Caliente I understand both refer to Aguas Calientes. It is the main village in Machupicchu district, belonging to Urubamba Province, in Cusco. (Seriously guys, two attempts and zero right :oops: )

2. Machu Picchu, written in two words, is not a town nor a village, but the archaeological site. It should be merged with Aguas Calientes, and perhaps renamed Machupicchu, but most Peruvians prefeer the name Aguas Calientes when talking about the village.
After reading this Wiki page I'm douthing to merge two profiles in one Machupicchu.
3. Pachacama is also misspelt. Should be Pachacámac. Here there might be some confusion, as Pachacámac could be a district in Lima Province, or an archaeological site. I bet it refers to the second one, so it should be renamed as Lurín since this is the district where the site is. By the way, Lurín belongs to Lima Province.
Postal code 15800 takes me to Lurín, so that is the name now.
4. Sacsayhuaman is an archaeological site, not too far away from Cusco, where I find almost impossible to get a euro note. I was there during December 2.014, and there is nothing but big impressive stones and grass. No shops, no exchange offices, no ATMs. So this town sould be merged with Cusco.
Postal code 08165 says this is the place so I merged it with Cusco
5. Santa Anita Belongs to Lima (city province), not to Lima Region. By the way, it would be nice to rename Lima (city province) to Provincia de Lima.
Done, althoug I did not renamed the region name. Someone else can do that.
Thank you in advice.
Your Welcome and Thank You.
If you looking further there are more profiles in Peru without a dot. I leave it for now. I'm gonna look in to it in the futher
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 259 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 407
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
User avatar
Raumi
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 484
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:32 pm
Location: Santiago y Zaraíche - Murcia - Spain
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Raumi »

Great job!
Burdie wrote: Postal code 15800 takes me to Lurín, so that is the name now.
Just a minor thing, you added Lurín to Lima Region, but it belongs to Lima Province. I know it is confusing but when talking about Lima, the province doesn't belong to the region. Wikipedia might mess it up a little bit, but you can trust me. :wink:

Thanks again!
Spanish representative on the Board of Directors.
Current vice president of the Association Européenne des EuroBillTrackers
My statistics.
User avatar
negative
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 387
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 2:53 pm
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by negative »

missing DOTs:

:flag-lt: Tiltagaliai http://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=163512852
55.795604, 24.671880

:flag-lv: Barbele http://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=163510619
56.452468, 24.596962
User avatar
lmviterbo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by lmviterbo »

Not missing any more. :)
User avatar
negative
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 387
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 2:53 pm
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by negative »

User avatar
lmviterbo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by lmviterbo »

Merged, thanks.
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”