Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5

User avatar
negative
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 387
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 2:53 pm
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by negative »

missing dot for Lund (Sweden) 22476 55.694556908603936, 13.242329777347807
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=249688824
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1946
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

negative wrote: Sun Oct 12, 2025 7:17 pm missing dot for Lund (Sweden) 22476 55.694556908603936, 13.242329777347807
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=249688824
done :D
User avatar
de*lerger
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5292
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Lies - Terschelling (NL)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by de*lerger »

A few missing dots from my holiday:

:flag-cz: Lety 49.9423, 14.0282
:flag-cz: Králův Dvůr 49.9225, 14.2537

And one from last year's holiday in Albania. There is a dot, but it doesn't appear on my map. It's probably misplaced.

Dajç 41.9149, 19.6045
My map
User avatar
LArdennais
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 14171
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:58 am
Location: Quelque part en Ardenne profonde...

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by LArdennais »

Done for all three.
http://liste.eurobillets.free.fr/ & http://liste.eurobillets.free.fr/index2.htm : don't miss it every day ! à zieuter tous les jours ! kijk elke dag ! :D

https://play.google.com/store/apps/deta ... l=fr&gl=US : A utiliser sans modération ! Use it without moderation ! :)
petox
Euro-Regular
Euro-Regular
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 7:32 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by petox »

Hi,
I entered a note in 18010 Granada, but the dot appears over centre of the city (see attached screen print), while Google shows that majority of 18010 area is more to the east (see Google screen print attached).
Can this be fixed or am I wrong and that is not how the dots are displayed?
Thanks
Attachments
Screenshot_20251027-192106.Maps.png
Screenshot_20251027-192106.Maps.png (1.16 MiB) Viewed 504 times
Screenshot_20251027-192133.Opera.png
Screenshot_20251027-192133.Opera.png (1.29 MiB) Viewed 504 times
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1990
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

petox wrote: Mon Oct 27, 2025 8:48 pm Hi,
Can this be fixed or am I wrong and that is not how the dots are displayed?
Thanks
Hi Petox,

No, You are not wrong, we try to be so accurate as possible. Granada 18010 is dotted where it is.
If I look to the postoffices in Granada 18010 The most are situated in the centre, so for this time I think the dot is on a better place than in the centre of 18010 that is more outside

Sugestions are welcome
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 259 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 407
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
User avatar
lmviterbo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 7047
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by lmviterbo »

Petox, the dot coords for Granada (18010) is now corrected. You may have to wait a few hours to see that reflected on your map. Or, luckily, a simple hard refresh will do.

Burdie: I took the liberty of geolocating Granada (18010) to 37.1871, -3.5885 (@ Parque Cármenes de San Miguel). I have also deleted all other (18010) location children within the Granada profile. As you may know, you don't need to geolocate all children: the system will automatically assign the exact same geolocation to any child with the exact same postal code within its parent, if it finds one.
petox
Euro-Regular
Euro-Regular
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 7:32 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by petox »

What a team work when getting this done, thanks to all involved 8)
User avatar
Tárrega
Euro-Regular
Euro-Regular
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2025 2:29 pm
Location: Kgs. Lyngby

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Tárrega »

Hi!

Could someone please help me with this dot:

https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=250796088

I'm not completely sure if I've chosen the right city.. Is it Jerez-Sanlucar, Las Tablas or Cádiz? There's so many possibilities, but I have a feeling that I should have chosen Las Tablas.

Thank you very much in advance!

-Tárrega
käteistä ei voita mikään 8)
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1946
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

Tárrega wrote: Sun Nov 23, 2025 7:07 pm Hi!

Could someone please help me with this dot:

https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=250796088

I'm not completely sure if I've chosen the right city.. Is it Jerez-Sanlucar, Las Tablas or Cádiz? There's so many possibilities, but I have a feeling that I should have chosen Las Tablas.

Thank you very much in advance!

-Tárrega
Looking at the comment I'd agree with you. Please change the location to 11408 Las Tablas if possible.

I've created a new entry for :flag-es: 11408 Las Tablas and merged it with the used city "Jerez-Sanlucar, Cádiz" in the profile of :arrow: Las Tablas.
User avatar
Tárrega
Euro-Regular
Euro-Regular
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2025 2:29 pm
Location: Kgs. Lyngby

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Tárrega »

Great! Thank you so much Tigerpranke! :D I'll change the city to Las Tablas. ¡Gracias y hasta luego!
käteistä ei voita mikään 8)
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”