Profiles are merged now. Thanks for the hint!Vunono wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2026 9:46 pm In the province of Cádiz there are two duplicated locations: Pueblo Nuevo de Guadiaro (https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=192443 and https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=252777) and Puerto de Gáliz (https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=137445 and https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=192277, both misspelled). Could anybody merge them? Thank you!
Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
- Akai
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:31 pm
- Location: Jaén, Andalucía, España (Spain)
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Please change the name of the Paraguayan capital to just Asunción
The long name is the foundation name.
https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=140959
The long name is the foundation name.
https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=140959
Last edited by Akai on Fri May 01, 2026 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Akai
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:31 pm
- Location: Jaén, Andalucía, España (Spain)
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
.
Last edited by Akai on Fri May 01, 2026 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Done.Akai wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 3:27 pm Please change the name of the Paraguayan capital to just Asunción
The long name is the foundation name.
https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=140959
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I've introduced some notes in the town of Benaocaz (province of Cádiz, Spain): https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=27457
https://maps.app.goo.gl/JHdobbTaRhyKMuYQ7?g_st=ac
Thank you!
https://maps.app.goo.gl/JHdobbTaRhyKMuYQ7?g_st=ac
Thank you!
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Done.Vunono wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2026 3:46 pm I've introduced some notes in the town of Benaocaz (province of Cádiz, Spain): https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=27457
https://maps.app.goo.gl/JHdobbTaRhyKMuYQ7?g_st=ac
Thank you!
- laurentina
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 9991
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:23 am
- Location: Switzerland
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
please merge Erpeldingen an der Sauer with Erpeldange (German - French names)
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=255243147
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=255243147
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Done.laurentina wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2026 1:11 pm please merge Erpeldingen an der Sauer with Erpeldange (German - French names)
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=255243147
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Please merge this profile with Sofia:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274549
48013 Zorrotza should belong to Bilbao:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274476
23478 Arrollo Frío:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274463
Google says:
„The coordinates for Arroyo Frío (postal code 23478) in Jaén, Spain, are approximately
N 37.9329
W 2.9157
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274549
48013 Zorrotza should belong to Bilbao:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274476
23478 Arrollo Frío:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274463
Google says:
„The coordinates for Arroyo Frío (postal code 23478) in Jaén, Spain, are approximately
N 37.9329
W 2.9157
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Done.joergb30 wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 12:13 pm Please merge this profile with Sofia:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274549
48013 Zorrotza should belong to Bilbao:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274476
23478 Arrollo Frío:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274463
Google says:
„The coordinates for Arroyo Frío (postal code 23478) in Jaén, Spain, are approximately
N 37.9329
W 2.9157
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
The dot for Barcelona Airport (postcode 08820) misses the airport, the dot is too far north (it covers the city).
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223438702
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223438702
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
You should change your entry to Aeropuerto de Barcelona-El Prat (postcode 08820). This location has the coordinates 41.3065, 2.0741.marbe166 wrote: ↑Mon May 11, 2026 2:48 pm The dot for Barcelona Airport (postcode 08820) misses the airport, the dot is too far north (it covers the city).
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223438702
-
MDeen
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 2211
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 11:52 am
- Location: Helden, The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Below the main dot for Genova
there is a dot with little land that also has a part of Genova in it. I think some locations are misrepresented in the upper dot.
Genoa 16145 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16145 is not. I think Genova 16145 should be in the lower dot.
Quarto Dei Mille 16148 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16148 is not. I think Genova 16148 should be in the lower dot.
Genoa 16145 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16145 is not. I think Genova 16145 should be in the lower dot.
Quarto Dei Mille 16148 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16148 is not. I think Genova 16148 should be in the lower dot.
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
After reviewing the situation, I adjusted the coordinates. Thanks for the hint!MDeen wrote: ↑Fri May 15, 2026 9:07 pm Below the main dot for Genovathere is a dot with little land that also has a part of Genova in it. I think some locations are misrepresented in the upper dot.
Genoa 16145 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16145 is not. I think Genova 16145 should be in the lower dot.
Quarto Dei Mille 16148 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16148 is not. I think Genova 16148 should be in the lower dot.

