Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5

User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1981
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

Vunono wrote: Thu Apr 30, 2026 9:46 pm In the province of Cádiz there are two duplicated locations: Pueblo Nuevo de Guadiaro (https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=192443 and https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=252777) and Puerto de Gáliz (https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=137445 and https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=192277, both misspelled). Could anybody merge them? Thank you!
Profiles are merged now. Thanks for the hint!
User avatar
Akai
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:31 pm
Location: Jaén, Andalucía, España (Spain)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Akai »

Please change the name of the Paraguayan capital to just Asunción
The long name is the foundation name.
https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=140959
Last edited by Akai on Fri May 01, 2026 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Akai
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:31 pm
Location: Jaén, Andalucía, España (Spain)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Akai »

.
Last edited by Akai on Fri May 01, 2026 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Akai
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:31 pm
Location: Jaén, Andalucía, España (Spain)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Akai »

.
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1981
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

Akai wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 3:27 pm Please change the name of the Paraguayan capital to just Asunción
The long name is the foundation name.
https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=140959
Done.
User avatar
Vunono
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 323
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:08 pm
Location: Cádiz, España

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Vunono »

I've introduced some notes in the town of Benaocaz (province of Cádiz, Spain): https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=27457
https://maps.app.goo.gl/JHdobbTaRhyKMuYQ7?g_st=ac
Thank you!
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1981
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

Vunono wrote: Sun May 03, 2026 3:46 pm I've introduced some notes in the town of Benaocaz (province of Cádiz, Spain): https://es.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=27457
https://maps.app.goo.gl/JHdobbTaRhyKMuYQ7?g_st=ac
Thank you!
Done.
User avatar
laurentina
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 9991
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:23 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by laurentina »

please merge Erpeldingen an der Sauer with Erpeldange (German - French names)
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=255243147
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1981
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

laurentina wrote: Mon May 04, 2026 1:11 pm please merge Erpeldingen an der Sauer with Erpeldange (German - French names)
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=255243147
Done.
joergb30
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 1:59 am
Location: Kassel, Germany

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by joergb30 »

Please merge this profile with Sofia:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274549

48013 Zorrotza should belong to Bilbao:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274476

23478 Arrollo Frío:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274463

Google says:
„The coordinates for Arroyo Frío (postal code 23478) in Jaén, Spain, are approximately
N 37.9329
W 2.9157
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1981
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

joergb30 wrote: Tue May 05, 2026 12:13 pm Please merge this profile with Sofia:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274549

48013 Zorrotza should belong to Bilbao:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274476

23478 Arrollo Frío:
https://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=274463

Google says:
„The coordinates for Arroyo Frío (postal code 23478) in Jaén, Spain, are approximately
N 37.9329
W 2.9157
Done.
marbe166
Euro-Newbie
Euro-Newbie
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:02 pm
Location: Köln, Germany

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by marbe166 »

The dot for Barcelona Airport (postcode 08820) misses the airport, the dot is too far north (it covers the city).
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223438702
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1981
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

marbe166 wrote: Mon May 11, 2026 2:48 pm The dot for Barcelona Airport (postcode 08820) misses the airport, the dot is too far north (it covers the city).
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=223438702
You should change your entry to Aeropuerto de Barcelona-El Prat (postcode 08820). This location has the coordinates 41.3065, 2.0741.
MDeen
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2211
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 11:52 am
Location: Helden, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by MDeen »

Below the main dot for Genova :flag-it: there is a dot with little land that also has a part of Genova in it. I think some locations are misrepresented in the upper dot.

Genoa 16145 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16145 is not. I think Genova 16145 should be in the lower dot.
Quarto Dei Mille 16148 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16148 is not. I think Genova 16148 should be in the lower dot.
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1981
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

MDeen wrote: Fri May 15, 2026 9:07 pm Below the main dot for Genova :flag-it: there is a dot with little land that also has a part of Genova in it. I think some locations are misrepresented in the upper dot.

Genoa 16145 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16145 is not. I think Genova 16145 should be in the lower dot.
Quarto Dei Mille 16148 is in the lower dot, but Genova 16148 is not. I think Genova 16148 should be in the lower dot.
After reviewing the situation, I adjusted the coordinates. Thanks for the hint!
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”