That's fine in cases like this, I'd say.Licht & Feuer wrote:So do I but in exceptional cases like this an exception should be allowed - this bill will certainly not been entered in Thailand again but return to somewhere in €-Land, maybe Germany.wisi wrote:Yes, that is the way it is ment, even the comments on the Page states:www.eurobilltracker.com wrote:Enter the name of the city where you got the note
The crucial point for tracking is that the note is entered at a location where it has physically been. Each owner of a note should know for sure where he got the note, even if he's spent the note already. (NB. Our US counterpart Where's George insists that the bill must be in direct possession of the user when and where he enters it. Indeed, this is the only way to have absolute certainty.) Typically users don't know in advance where they're going to spend a certain banknote.
The disputed entry is a particularly good one because it gives both the location where the bill was received and where it was spent.
