debemaks wrote:Smike wrote:About tintin, if you look at his NIG statistics (especially his
huge table) you can see he doesn't only enter from every combination he has a few (e.g. the finnish notes, only 5

but all have the same first three digits), but also a lot of non existing combinations (check the french notes). And even of those he always enters more then one! I'd say that's a strange distribution of notes, if not impossible.
I had a lookat the huge table for Italy, which I'm more familiar with, a lots of strange mistakes seems to be there

faking or even worst bulshitting code by chance
e.g.::note-5: J001 S002 - 5**
S020 - 6**
S152 - 10** IMPOSSIBLE

S001 - 13**
S003 - 7**
S004 - 7**
S019 - 4**
S125 - 14** IMPOSSIBLE
really strange, look at the L012 20€ for example
France U**05 - 6*
France U**10 - 7*
France U**25 - 5*
France U**28 - 4*
France U**33 - 10***
France U**34 - 14**
France U**35 - 31**
France U**36 - 9*
France U**42 - 11*
France U**51 - 5*
France U**58 - 1
France U**59 - 4*
France U**65 - 6*
France U**74 - 6*
France U**85 - 6*
France U**94 - 6*
France U**95 - 11*
France U**96 - 5*
only the 33, 34 and 35 are correct. It is really strange that he has that often 4,5,6,9,11 of the wrong combinations. Are these all series?
I once gave you clear evidence that he took some specific note data from Eurotracer (which some of you didn't believe, possibly because they thought, someone who is active on the forum just could not do such things), but this is a completely different thing, as the printer codes are visible at Eurotracer, so I don't think these wrong combinations are the notes from ET. He also has many more notes that look perfectly fine.
I think most of his notes are very accurate, but then he added some additional notes that do not really apply to the rules of note data acquisition
