Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5

User avatar
magpie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3286
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 9:16 pm
Location: Düsseldorf
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by magpie »

lmviterbo wrote:
magpie wrote:Can :flag-be: 5640 Maison-St-Gérard be assigned to :flag-be: 5640 Maison or to :flag-be: 5640 Saint-Gérard?
My usual reasoning as a plotter is to assume that when some ebtist defines a "city" as Small Place - Larger Place, as is the case here, the note probably was from Small Place, and s/he was just trying to specify exactly which Small Place this is within an universe of several places named the same as Small Place, without realizing that Small Place + Zipcode would most likely be enough to define the exact place.

So I believe we can take an educated guess and assume the location here should be 5640 Maison.
Since there are profile for both under the same zip I wouldn't guess...
User avatar
lmviterbo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 7534
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by lmviterbo »

magpie wrote:Since there are profile for both under the same zip I wouldn't guess...
8O Maybe you're right but not because of that.

If there weren't a profile for Saint-Gérard (5640) some city-admin would create it if that was the right thing to do. That there are already profiles for both "cities" under the same zip, in fact, doesn't affect my reasoning a bit.

So what's faulty in my stream of thought? Or maybe you didn't quite get it -- I'm sorry for the long convoluted sentence :oops: (but then again that's something you're most used to in German ;))
User avatar
Phaseolus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13441
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Quelque part ou même ailleurs !
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Phaseolus »

Yelverdack wrote:Châtel, Haute-Savoie, France (zip 74390) is not in the correct dot
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=17572
There is probably many cities called Châtel in France.
Could you correct mine, please ?
I have registered bills in this same sity and it is (correctly) located here
User avatar
magpie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3286
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 9:16 pm
Location: Düsseldorf
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by magpie »

Phaseolus wrote:
Yelverdack wrote:Châtel, Haute-Savoie, France (zip 74390) is not in the correct dot
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=17572
There is probably many cities called Châtel in France.
Could you correct mine, please ?
I have registered bills in this same sity and it is (correctly) located here
...because I fixed it this morning :)
knospe
Euro-Regular
Euro-Regular
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:06 am
Location: Erfurt
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by knospe »

Neuostheim (ID 66660), Neuhermsheim (ID 66094), Feudenheim (ID 27433), "Friedrichsfeld (68229)" from "Friedrichsfeld (ID 29222)", Neckarau (ID 64995), Rheinau (ID 79824), Vogelstang (ID 110659), "Waldhof (68305)" from "Waldhof (ID 111560)", Wallstadt (ID 111768) :arrow: Mannheim (ID 58239) (see: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mannheim#Stadtgliederung)
Waldhof falkenstein (ID 111561) :arrow: Waldhof-Falkenstein
Falkenstein - harz (ID 26719), Falkenstein(harz) (ID 26721), Falkenstein/harz (ID 26723) :arrow: Falkenstein (Harz) (ID 26718)
Erftstadt Gymnich (ID 146922) :arrow: Erftstadt (ID 25564)
Hambourg (ID 36227), Hambrug (ID 36234), Hamm nord (ID 36365), Hmaburg (ID 40391), Kleiner grasbrook (ID 47895), Rothenburgsort (ID 81941), Sankt georg (ID 86605), Sankt pauli (ID 86940), St georg (ID 94156), St pauli (ID 95347), St. georg (ID 96442), St. pauli (ID 97698), St.georg (ID 98626), St.pauli (ID 99854), Veddel (ID 108624) :arrow: Hamburg (ID 36240)
Aurisina / Nabrežina (ID 124351) :arrow: Duino-Aurisina / Devin-Nabrežina (ID 23003)
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duino-Aurisina)

Εύοσμος (ID 147293), Ευόσμος (ID 147183), [Evosmon (ID 26512)] :arrow: Evosmo (ID 26511) and renamed in Evosmos :?: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evosmos
User avatar
yli
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5870
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:34 am
Location: TILBURG
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by yli »

lmviterbo wrote:
magpie wrote:Can :flag-be: 5640 Maison-St-Gérard be assigned to :flag-be: 5640 Maison or to :flag-be: 5640 Saint-Gérard?
My usual reasoning as a plotter is to assume that when some ebtist defines a "city" as Small Place - Larger Place, as is the case here, the note probably was from Small Place, and s/he was just trying to specify exactly which Small Place this is within an universe of several places named the same as Small Place, without realizing that Small Place + Zipcode would most likely be enough to define the exact place.

So I believe we can take an educated guess and assume the location here should be 5640 Maison.
Although guessing isn't a form of sience, you were right. Both locations are small, but 5640 Maison is even smaller. Maison-St-Gérard doesn't exist (Saint-Gérard won't even be on the roadsign - because it isn't a commune in Wallonia)

So :flag-be: 5640 Maison-St-Gérard should be assigned to :flag-be: 5640 Maison
Jelle zonder internet. Het was een leuke hobby, maar niet mijn hobby. Een leven zonder internet is mijn ding. Een leven van geld uitgeven in plaats van tracken zeg maar.... hahaha. Ja, er mag gelachen worden.
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten :lol:
User avatar
lmviterbo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 7534
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by lmviterbo »

yli wrote:Although guessing isn't a form of sience, you were right. Both locations are small, but 5640 Maison is even smaller.
Well, I knew that Maison was smaller than Saint-Gérard, I checked it, that of course was not part of my guessing. I just guessed that, being smaller and in the outskirts of Saint-Gérard, it would be very unlikely if anyone in Saint-Gérard was calling it Maison-St-Gérard, but it would be more than natural that someone in Maison would call it Maison-St-Gérard. Not science, not even guessing, just common sense, actually... (Apparently, there are even locals who call it Maison-Saint-Gérard, as in http://ditch4.skyrock.com/6.html.)
yli wrote:(Saint-Gérard won't even be on the roadsign - because it isn't a commune in Wallonia)
In Wallonia, only communes have road signs? Weird...

(And... I know you wrote it in parentheses, but how does that have to do with the issue? Even if St.-Gérard doesn't have a location road sign, Maison certainly wouldn't have it at all.)
User avatar
yli
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5870
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:34 am
Location: TILBURG
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by yli »

Sign of locations in Belgium are like this :

Image

Walshoutem is the village
Landen the name of the municipality (commun)

So, in the example of 5640 Maison this sign would be Maison - Mettet.

And to make it complex Saint-Gérard is a partmunicipality of Mettet

Maison is part of the partmunicipality of Saint-Gérard
Jelle zonder internet. Het was een leuke hobby, maar niet mijn hobby. Een leven zonder internet is mijn ding. Een leven van geld uitgeven in plaats van tracken zeg maar.... hahaha. Ja, er mag gelachen worden.
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten :lol:
User avatar
lmviterbo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 7534
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by lmviterbo »

So, after all, there must be a road sign for the village of Saint-Gérard, which is indeed a village in its own right inside the Saint-Gérard section de commune (deelgemeente), an area encompassing some more villages, including Maison, which most likely will have its own road sign on road N 988, too. After all, it's the same that happens in Portugal, in Spain, in France or in Italy, and probably in many other countries.
User avatar
groentje
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3016
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: Brussels Capital Region, Belgium

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by groentje »

To make it even more difficult, every commune is boss, so e.g. Deinze will only show plates for Deinze, without the individual placename on it, some, like Deerlijk, even has a plate for Statiewijk.
User avatar
Zjonbelz
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1265
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Kaulille, Belgium
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Zjonbelz »

:flag-nl: Drijber hasn't got a dot yet. Coordinates are: 52.7914 N, 6.5372 E
knospe
Euro-Regular
Euro-Regular
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:06 am
Location: Erfurt
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by knospe »

Zjonbelz wrote: :flag-nl: Drijber hasn't got a dot yet. Coordinates are: 52.7914 N, 6.5372 E
It does now!

Greifswald-Wieck (ID 147332), "Wieck (17493)" from "Wieck (ID 114299)", Riems (ID 80220), Riemserort (ID 80222) :arrow: Greifswald (ID 33397)
Alt negentin (ID 2389), Dargelin hof (ID 20093), Neu dargelin (ID 65382), Sestelin (ID 91495), Neu negentin (ID 65474) :arrow: Dargelin (ID 20092) (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dargelin#Ortsteile)
Alt ungnade (ID 2413), Levenhagen hof (ID 54731), Levenhagen hof 1 (ID 54732), Heilgeisthof (ID 38505), "Boltenhagen (17498)" from "Boltenhagen (ID 11903)" :arrow: Levenhagen (ID 54730) (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenhagen ... %20Verkehr)
Dersekow hof (ID 20978) :arrow: Dersekow (ID 20977)
Wieck (darß) (ID 114300), Wieck (darss) (ID 114301), Wieck - darß (ID 114302), Wieck - darss (ID 114303), Wieck / darß (ID 114304), Wieck / darss (ID 114305), Wieck a darß (ID 114307), Wieck a darss (ID 114308), Wieck a. darß (ID 114309), Wieck a. darss (ID 114310), Wieck am darß (ID 114311), Wieck am darss (ID 114312), Wieck darß (ID 114313), Wieck darss (ID 114314), Wieck(darß) (ID 114315), Wieck(darss) (ID 114316), Wieck/darß (ID 114318), Wieck/darss (ID 114319), "Wieck (18375)" from "Wieck (ID 114299)" :arrow: Wieck a. Darß
Wieck /rügen (ID 114306), "Wieck (18556)" from "Wieck (ID 114299)" :arrow: Wiek (ID 114359) (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiek_(R%C3%BCgen))
"Wieck (17506)" from "Wieck (ID 114299)" :arrow: Gützkow (ID 128693) (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%BCtzkow#Ortsteile)
Wüst eldena (ID 112457), Wuest eldena (ID 116035), Wust eldena (ID 116183) :arrow: Süderholz (ID 88183) (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eldena_(Be ... C3%A4rung), last point)
Neuboltenhagen (ID 65579), Neu boltenhagen (ID 65372) :arrow: Neu Boltenhagen
Fraetow (ID 28540), Fratow (ID 28761) :arrow: Frätow (ID 28822)
Helmshagen 2 (ID 38843), Helmshagen 1 (ID 38842) :arrow: Helmshagen (ID 38841)
Hinrichshagen hof 2 (ID 40076), Hinrichshagen hof 1 (ID 40075), Hinrichshagen hof (ID 40074), "Hinrichshagen (17498)" from "Hinrichshagen (ID 40073)" :arrow: Hinrichshagen (Vorpommern)
Koelpinsee (ID 48604) :arrow: Kölpinsee (ID 45773)
Leist 3 (ID 53980), Leist 2 (ID 53979), Leist 1 (ID 53978) :arrow: Leist (ID 53977)
Levenhagen hof 1 (ID 54732), Levenhagen hof (ID 54731) :arrow: Levenhagen (ID 54730)
Lutow (ID 57241), Luetow (ID 56982) :arrow: Lütow (ID 53171)
Luehmannsdorf (ID 56940) :arrow: Lühmannsdorf (ID 53115)
Moeckow (ID 61979) :arrow: Möckow (ID 59630)
Moelschow (ID 62022), Molschow (ID 62300) :arrow: Mölschow (ID 59692)
Muessow (ID 63975), Mussow (ID 64335) :arrow: Müssow (ID 60231)
Sanz försterei (ID 87534), Sanz foersterei (ID 87535), Sanz hof (ID 87536), Sanz hof 5 (ID 87537), Sanz hof V (ID 87538) :arrow: Sanz (ID 87533)
Uckeritz (ID 106575) :arrow: Ueckeritz (ID 106624)
Wilhelmshoeh (ID 114740) :arrow: Wilhelmshöh (ID 114737)
Zuessow (ID 117450) :arrow: Züssow (ID 116712)
Heringsdorf-Siggen (ID 39292), Heringsdorf-Süssau (ID 39291), Heringsdorf-Augustenhof (ID 39290) :arrow: Heringsdorf (ID 39289)
Ahlbeck (ID 1094) :arrow: Heringsdorf (ID 90854) :arrow: name it Ostseebad Heringsdorf
Dreizehnhausen (ID 22592), Groß Petershagen (ID 33722), Klein Petershagen (ID 47703), Jarmshagen dorf (ID 43855), Jarmshagen hof (ID 43856), Groß Kieshof (ID 33693), Kieshof ausbau (ID 46697), Klein kieshof (ID 47651), "Steffenshagen (17498)" from "Steffenshagen (ID 101252)", "Immenhorst (17498)" from "Immenhorst (ID 43091)", "Wackerow (17498)" from "Wackerow (ID 111215)" :arrow: Wackerow (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wackerow#Ortsteile)
"Wackerow (17153)" from "Wackerow (ID 111215)", "Galenbeck (17153)" from "Galenbeck (ID 29927)" :arrow: Ritzerow (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritzerow)

Åetershagen (ID 5842) :arrow: Groß Petershagen (ID 33722) :?: zip code suggests that.
User avatar
roberdy
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1329
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:40 pm
Location: Nürnberger Land, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by roberdy »

Please merge :flag-at: Moosburg in Kärnten and :flag-at: Moosburg.

(There's also another :flag-de: Moosburg...)
User avatar
magpie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3286
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 9:16 pm
Location: Düsseldorf
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by magpie »

roberdy wrote:Please merge :flag-at: Moosburg in Kärnten and :flag-at: Moosburg.

(There's also another :flag-de: Moosburg...)
done...
Guest

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Guest »

pls merge
"Hochheim (99092)" from "Hochheim (ID 40465)" :arrow: Erfurt (ID 25570)
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”