Since there are profile for both under the same zip I wouldn't guess...lmviterbo wrote:My usual reasoning as a plotter is to assume that when some ebtist defines a "city" as Small Place - Larger Place, as is the case here, the note probably was from Small Place, and s/he was just trying to specify exactly which Small Place this is within an universe of several places named the same as Small Place, without realizing that Small Place + Zipcode would most likely be enough to define the exact place.magpie wrote:Can5640 Maison-St-Gérard be assigned to
5640 Maison or to
5640 Saint-Gérard?
So I believe we can take an educated guess and assume the location here should be 5640 Maison.
Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
- lmviterbo
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 7534
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: Lisboa, Portugal
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
magpie wrote:Since there are profile for both under the same zip I wouldn't guess...
If there weren't a profile for Saint-Gérard (5640) some city-admin would create it if that was the right thing to do. That there are already profiles for both "cities" under the same zip, in fact, doesn't affect my reasoning a bit.
So what's faulty in my stream of thought? Or maybe you didn't quite get it -- I'm sorry for the long convoluted sentence
- Phaseolus
- Forum Moderator

- Posts: 13441
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 2:16 pm
- Location: Quelque part ou même ailleurs !
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I have registered bills in this same sity and it is (correctly) located hereYelverdack wrote:Châtel, Haute-Savoie, France (zip 74390) is not in the correct dot
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=17572
There is probably many cities called Châtel in France.
Could you correct mine, please ?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
...because I fixed it this morningPhaseolus wrote:I have registered bills in this same sity and it is (correctly) located hereYelverdack wrote:Châtel, Haute-Savoie, France (zip 74390) is not in the correct dot
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=17572
There is probably many cities called Châtel in France.
Could you correct mine, please ?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Neuostheim (ID 66660), Neuhermsheim (ID 66094), Feudenheim (ID 27433), "Friedrichsfeld (68229)" from "Friedrichsfeld (ID 29222)", Neckarau (ID 64995), Rheinau (ID 79824), Vogelstang (ID 110659), "Waldhof (68305)" from "Waldhof (ID 111560)", Wallstadt (ID 111768)
Mannheim (ID 58239) (see: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mannheim#Stadtgliederung)
Waldhof falkenstein (ID 111561)
Waldhof-Falkenstein
Falkenstein - harz (ID 26719), Falkenstein(harz) (ID 26721), Falkenstein/harz (ID 26723)
Falkenstein (Harz) (ID 26718)
Erftstadt Gymnich (ID 146922)
Erftstadt (ID 25564)
Hambourg (ID 36227), Hambrug (ID 36234), Hamm nord (ID 36365), Hmaburg (ID 40391), Kleiner grasbrook (ID 47895), Rothenburgsort (ID 81941), Sankt georg (ID 86605), Sankt pauli (ID 86940), St georg (ID 94156), St pauli (ID 95347), St. georg (ID 96442), St. pauli (ID 97698), St.georg (ID 98626), St.pauli (ID 99854), Veddel (ID 108624)
Hamburg (ID 36240)
Aurisina / Nabrežina (ID 124351)
Duino-Aurisina / Devin-Nabrežina (ID 23003)
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duino-Aurisina)
Εύοσμος (ID 147293), Ευόσμος (ID 147183), [Evosmon (ID 26512)]
Evosmo (ID 26511) and renamed in Evosmos
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evosmos
Waldhof falkenstein (ID 111561)
Falkenstein - harz (ID 26719), Falkenstein(harz) (ID 26721), Falkenstein/harz (ID 26723)
Erftstadt Gymnich (ID 146922)
Hambourg (ID 36227), Hambrug (ID 36234), Hamm nord (ID 36365), Hmaburg (ID 40391), Kleiner grasbrook (ID 47895), Rothenburgsort (ID 81941), Sankt georg (ID 86605), Sankt pauli (ID 86940), St georg (ID 94156), St pauli (ID 95347), St. georg (ID 96442), St. pauli (ID 97698), St.georg (ID 98626), St.pauli (ID 99854), Veddel (ID 108624)
Aurisina / Nabrežina (ID 124351)
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duino-Aurisina)
Εύοσμος (ID 147293), Ευόσμος (ID 147183), [Evosmon (ID 26512)]
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Although guessing isn't a form of sience, you were right. Both locations are small, but 5640 Maison is even smaller. Maison-St-Gérard doesn't exist (Saint-Gérard won't even be on the roadsign - because it isn't a commune in Wallonia)lmviterbo wrote:My usual reasoning as a plotter is to assume that when some ebtist defines a "city" as Small Place - Larger Place, as is the case here, the note probably was from Small Place, and s/he was just trying to specify exactly which Small Place this is within an universe of several places named the same as Small Place, without realizing that Small Place + Zipcode would most likely be enough to define the exact place.magpie wrote:Can5640 Maison-St-Gérard be assigned to
5640 Maison or to
5640 Saint-Gérard?
So I believe we can take an educated guess and assume the location here should be 5640 Maison.
So
Jelle zonder internet. Het was een leuke hobby, maar niet mijn hobby. Een leven zonder internet is mijn ding. Een leven van geld uitgeven in plaats van tracken zeg maar.... hahaha. Ja, er mag gelachen worden.
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten
- lmviterbo
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 7534
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: Lisboa, Portugal
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Well, I knew that Maison was smaller than Saint-Gérard, I checked it, that of course was not part of my guessing. I just guessed that, being smaller and in the outskirts of Saint-Gérard, it would be very unlikely if anyone in Saint-Gérard was calling it Maison-St-Gérard, but it would be more than natural that someone in Maison would call it Maison-St-Gérard. Not science, not even guessing, just common sense, actually... (Apparently, there are even locals who call it Maison-Saint-Gérard, as in http://ditch4.skyrock.com/6.html.)yli wrote:Although guessing isn't a form of sience, you were right. Both locations are small, but 5640 Maison is even smaller.
In Wallonia, only communes have road signs? Weird...yli wrote:(Saint-Gérard won't even be on the roadsign - because it isn't a commune in Wallonia)
(And... I know you wrote it in parentheses, but how does that have to do with the issue? Even if St.-Gérard doesn't have a location road sign, Maison certainly wouldn't have it at all.)
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Sign of locations in Belgium are like this :

Walshoutem is the village
Landen the name of the municipality (commun)
So, in the example of 5640 Maison this sign would be Maison - Mettet.
And to make it complex Saint-Gérard is a partmunicipality of Mettet
Maison is part of the partmunicipality of Saint-Gérard
Walshoutem is the village
Landen the name of the municipality (commun)
So, in the example of 5640 Maison this sign would be Maison - Mettet.
And to make it complex Saint-Gérard is a partmunicipality of Mettet
Maison is part of the partmunicipality of Saint-Gérard
Jelle zonder internet. Het was een leuke hobby, maar niet mijn hobby. Een leven zonder internet is mijn ding. Een leven van geld uitgeven in plaats van tracken zeg maar.... hahaha. Ja, er mag gelachen worden.
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten
- lmviterbo
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 7534
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: Lisboa, Portugal
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
So, after all, there must be a road sign for the village of Saint-Gérard, which is indeed a village in its own right inside the Saint-Gérard section de commune (deelgemeente), an area encompassing some more villages, including Maison, which most likely will have its own road sign on road N 988, too. After all, it's the same that happens in Portugal, in Spain, in France or in Italy, and probably in many other countries.
- groentje
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 3016
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 6:47 pm
- Location: Brussels Capital Region, Belgium
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
To make it even more difficult, every commune is boss, so e.g. Deinze will only show plates for Deinze, without the individual placename on it, some, like Deerlijk, even has a plate for Statiewijk.
- Zjonbelz
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1265
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Kaulille, Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
It does now!Zjonbelz wrote:Drijber hasn't got a dot yet. Coordinates are: 52.7914 N, 6.5372 E
Greifswald-Wieck (ID 147332), "Wieck (17493)" from "Wieck (ID 114299)", Riems (ID 80220), Riemserort (ID 80222)
Alt negentin (ID 2389), Dargelin hof (ID 20093), Neu dargelin (ID 65382), Sestelin (ID 91495), Neu negentin (ID 65474)
Alt ungnade (ID 2413), Levenhagen hof (ID 54731), Levenhagen hof 1 (ID 54732), Heilgeisthof (ID 38505), "Boltenhagen (17498)" from "Boltenhagen (ID 11903)"
Dersekow hof (ID 20978)
Wieck (darß) (ID 114300), Wieck (darss) (ID 114301), Wieck - darß (ID 114302), Wieck - darss (ID 114303), Wieck / darß (ID 114304), Wieck / darss (ID 114305), Wieck a darß (ID 114307), Wieck a darss (ID 114308), Wieck a. darß (ID 114309), Wieck a. darss (ID 114310), Wieck am darß (ID 114311), Wieck am darss (ID 114312), Wieck darß (ID 114313), Wieck darss (ID 114314), Wieck(darß) (ID 114315), Wieck(darss) (ID 114316), Wieck/darß (ID 114318), Wieck/darss (ID 114319), "Wieck (18375)" from "Wieck (ID 114299)"
Wieck /rügen (ID 114306), "Wieck (18556)" from "Wieck (ID 114299)"
"Wieck (17506)" from "Wieck (ID 114299)"
Wüst eldena (ID 112457), Wuest eldena (ID 116035), Wust eldena (ID 116183)
Neuboltenhagen (ID 65579), Neu boltenhagen (ID 65372)
Fraetow (ID 28540), Fratow (ID 28761)
Helmshagen 2 (ID 38843), Helmshagen 1 (ID 38842)
Hinrichshagen hof 2 (ID 40076), Hinrichshagen hof 1 (ID 40075), Hinrichshagen hof (ID 40074), "Hinrichshagen (17498)" from "Hinrichshagen (ID 40073)"
Koelpinsee (ID 48604)
Leist 3 (ID 53980), Leist 2 (ID 53979), Leist 1 (ID 53978)
Levenhagen hof 1 (ID 54732), Levenhagen hof (ID 54731)
Lutow (ID 57241), Luetow (ID 56982)
Luehmannsdorf (ID 56940)
Moeckow (ID 61979)
Moelschow (ID 62022), Molschow (ID 62300)
Muessow (ID 63975), Mussow (ID 64335)
Sanz försterei (ID 87534), Sanz foersterei (ID 87535), Sanz hof (ID 87536), Sanz hof 5 (ID 87537), Sanz hof V (ID 87538)
Uckeritz (ID 106575)
Wilhelmshoeh (ID 114740)
Zuessow (ID 117450)
Heringsdorf-Siggen (ID 39292), Heringsdorf-Süssau (ID 39291), Heringsdorf-Augustenhof (ID 39290)
Ahlbeck (ID 1094)
Dreizehnhausen (ID 22592), Groß Petershagen (ID 33722), Klein Petershagen (ID 47703), Jarmshagen dorf (ID 43855), Jarmshagen hof (ID 43856), Groß Kieshof (ID 33693), Kieshof ausbau (ID 46697), Klein kieshof (ID 47651), "Steffenshagen (17498)" from "Steffenshagen (ID 101252)", "Immenhorst (17498)" from "Immenhorst (ID 43091)", "Wackerow (17498)" from "Wackerow (ID 111215)"
"Wackerow (17153)" from "Wackerow (ID 111215)", "Galenbeck (17153)" from "Galenbeck (ID 29927)"
Åetershagen (ID 5842)
-
Guest
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
pls merge
"Hochheim (99092)" from "Hochheim (ID 40465)"
Erfurt (ID 25570)
"Hochheim (99092)" from "Hochheim (ID 40465)"
