Suspicious notes and users

Adela.Merchan · Post by **Adela.Merchan** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:38 pm

Finnish user eu-asukki too much lucky in Madrid (Spain) and only hitting other Finnish users (eija4143 and Tippis):

http://es.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=82973167" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://es.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=82973644" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I also have some doubts about this triple hit between Finnish users and a Belgian one. The note took exactly 3 years (26-2-2006 -> 26-2-2009) to cover 369 km inside Finland and only 1 and a half to reach Costa del Sol. Users involved: Ratskin, Jari-M and Revelstoke BC. I'm not pointing out any of them in special.

joergb30 · Post by **joergb30** » Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:29 pm

New "hit in serie" produced by Joaquim Aleixo

(...)
2010-07-23 20:22:01 Xxxxx2222xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-23 20:22:01 Xxxxx2222xxx (*) Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-23 20:22:01 Xxxxx2222xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
(...)

yoto · Post by **yoto** » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:40 pm

Adela.Merchan wrote:Finnish user eu-asukki too much lucky in Madrid (Spain) and only hitting other Finnish users (eija4143 and Tippis):

http://es.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=82973167" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://es.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=82973644" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I also have some doubts about this triple hit between Finnish users and a Belgian one. The note took exactly 3 years (26-2-2006 -> 26-2-2009) to cover 369 km inside Finland and only 1 and a half to reach Costa del Sol. Users involved: Ratskin, Jari-M and Revelstoke BC. I'm not pointing out any of them in special.

I don't quite understand this doubt.. maybe I am wrong, but for me it seems ok..
just wanted to say this because - even though it's good to follow wrong behaouviour, as there is fake notes, fake users, everyone should not to go into Gendercide Watc..(if that's the right word)
so please let's still be carefull when accusing users..shall we..

joergb30 · Post by **joergb30** » Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:10 pm

New "hit in serie" produced by Joaquim Aleixo

(...)
2010-07-24 17:38:32 Uxxxx2906xxx Lxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-24 17:38:32 Uxxxx2906xxx Lxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-24 17:38:32 Uxxxx2906xxx Lxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
(...)

Mr Euro · Post by **Mr Euro** » Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:51 am

Adela.Merchan wrote: I also have some doubts about this triple hit between Finnish users and a Belgian one. The note took exactly 3 years (26-2-2006 -> 26-2-2009) to cover 369 km inside Finland and only 1 and a half to reach Costa del Sol. Users involved: Ratskin, Jari-M and Revelstoke BC. I'm not pointing out any of them in special.

But you do by putting them in this topic. There is nothing suspicious about this triple. It's not because the triple involves Spain that it becomes suspicious. The Belgian user is a wellknown and trustworthy user in Belgium. So please, think twice before posting in here.

Ord€p · Post by **Ord€p** » Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:57 pm

And again Joaquim Aleixo:

2010-07-25 15:09:27 Mxxxx2403xxx Uxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 15:09:27 Mxxxx2403xxx Uxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 15:09:27 Mxxxx2403xxx (*) Uxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 15:09:26 Mxxxx2403xxx Uxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 15:09:26 Mxxxx2403xxx Uxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 15:09:26 Mxxxx2403xxx Uxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 15:09:26 Mxxxx2403xxx Uxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 15:09:26 Mxxxx2403xxx Uxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
...
2010-07-25 17:26:49 Xxxxx0103xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:26:49 Xxxxx0103xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:26:49 Xxxxx0103xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:26:49 Xxxxx0103xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:26:49 Xxxxx0103xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:26:49 Xxxxx0103xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:26:49 Xxxxx0103xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:26:49 Xxxxx0103xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:26:49 Xxxxx0103xxx (*) Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
...
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx (*) Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-25 17:39:52 Xxxxx0530xxx Rxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)

Dawizz · Post by **Dawizz** » Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:33 pm

How much more fake entries does this clow (Joaquim Aleixo) needs to make before some one stops him for good?

Ord€p · Post by **Ord€p** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:23 pm

Once again, Joaquim Aleixo:

2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx (*) Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)

Dawizz · Post by **Dawizz** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:06 pm

Ord€p wrote:Once again, Joaquim Aleixo:

2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx (*) Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)
2010-07-26 18:17:00 Vxxxx5937xxx Mxxxxx Faro ( Portugal, 8000-220)

Yeah this with me

delete his account period

he's having a laugh at EBT and the people who run it and it's legit users!!

ErGo · Post by **ErGo** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:56 pm

Dawizz wrote:Yeah this with me delete his account period he's having a laugh at EBT and the people who run it and it's legit users!!

You know this input is fake, the cleaning girls know it also - so lets waste him his time - in the end he will lost this notes and you are the one who is laughing

Bendder · Post by **Bendder** » Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:08 pm

bochius · Post by **bochius** » Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:58 pm

Public note!

JRR · Post by **JRR** » Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:05 pm

I was browsing through the note tables and I think I spotted a hit in series, which hasn't been mentioned here before.

User brandweerduiker

2010-07-19 09:24:54 5 EURPxxxx0797xxx Rxxxxx Sint-niklaas ( Flag for België België, 9111)
2010-07-19 09:24:54 5 EURPxxxx0797xxx Rxxxxx Sint-niklaas ( Flag for België België, 9111)
2010-07-19 09:24:54 5 EURPxxxx0797xxx Rxxxxx Sint-niklaas ( Flag for België België, 9111)
2010-07-19 09:24:54 5 EURPxxxx0797xxx (*) Rxxxxx Sint-niklaas ( Flag for België België, 9111)
2010-07-19 09:24:54 5 EURPxxxx0797xxx Rxxxxx Sint-niklaas ( Flag for België België, 9111)
2010-07-19 09:24:54 5 EURPxxxx0797xxx Rxxxxx Sint-niklaas ( Flag for België België, 9111)
2010-07-19 09:24:54 5 EURPxxxx0797xxx Rxxxxx Sint-niklaas ( Flag for België België, 9111)

Tjariet · Post by **Tjariet** » Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:48 pm

It seems to be a hit with us, and we found it in a non-UNC state, because it was found in a national Bank bundle, that are never UNC notes.

Can the hit be deleted?

yli · Post by **yli** » Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:30 pm

Tjariet wrote:Can the hit be deleted?

I don't think hits can be deleted, only moderated.
Notes can be deleted

EuroBillTracker

Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users

Re: Suspicious notes and users