Two speed Europe?

Discussion/News about Europe, EU, politics

Moderators: Fons, Phaseolus

Post Reply
matt.berlin
Euro-Regular in Training
Euro-Regular in Training
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2002 9:01 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Two speed Europe?

Post by matt.berlin »

Should countries such as the UK, Denmark and Sweden who consistently drag their feet over European integration be asked to consider their future in the EU? Is it not unfair for the few to hold up progress for the many?
User avatar
BossaNova
Euro-Expert
Euro-Expert
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Brussels

Post by BossaNova »

well we probably should give them more time..

being in the euro zone is not everything.. (look to Berlusconi), although some UK's political attitudes are very.. worrying :roll:
User avatar
pinguino79
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 313
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 5:44 pm
Location: Vicenza, Italy, EU

Post by pinguino79 »

My opinion is that the EU is based on cooperation; each member gives its countribution without being forced to do it. The reason is simple: forced cooperation is not cooperation!
4 gmail invites available. Send a PM providing your e-mail address.
User avatar
Olivier
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3358
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 9:58 pm
Location: Evian

Post by Olivier »

I think it's only a problem for these three countries, because the 10 newcomers will have to adopt the acquis.
The 10 already know that they are going to adopt Shengen, the euro, the social part of Maaastricht, etc...

UK is soon "only" 1/25 of the EU... its interest is now to rally the rest of the Union. Blair has understood that it's better to join and influence the events.

Thatcher's tactic ("no, no, no, no, no!") is no more possible. Look what has happened: 12 members have got the Euro, with our without UK...
User avatar
Olivier
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3358
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 9:58 pm
Location: Evian

Post by Olivier »

BossaNova wrote:well we probably should give them more time..
Yes, but at the same time, I understand Matt... Why should we wait for countries which always disagree with new projects?

What would happen if 14 agree for a federal/ confederal Europe and UK wants to remain only in a free trade market?
User avatar
BossaNova
Euro-Expert
Euro-Expert
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Brussels

Post by BossaNova »

Olivier wrote:
BossaNova wrote:well we probably should give them more time..
Yes, but at the same time, I understand Matt... Why should we wait for countries which always disagree with new projects?

What would happen if 14 agree for a federal/ confederal Europe and UK wants to remain only in a free trade market?
well, I must say I agree with a Europe à la Carte.. each country should decide how deply it wants to get in the Union..

one country should only be expelled from the Union when it has attitudes that goes against the interests of the Union.. being in the Echelon should be one reason (and it's not only UK.. many small european countries has agreements with USA, and small participations in the echelon...) :roll:
User avatar
iveohc
Euro-Newbie
Euro-Newbie
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 8:05 pm
Location: Deutschland|Germany

Post by iveohc »

BossaNova wrote:
Olivier wrote:
BossaNova wrote:well we probably should give them more time..
Yes, but at the same time, I understand Matt... Why should we wait for countries which always disagree with new projects?

What would happen if 14 agree for a federal/ confederal Europe and UK wants to remain only in a free trade market?
well, I must say I agree with a Europe à la Carte.. each country should decide how deply it wants to get in the Union..

one country should only be expelled from the Union when it has attitudes that goes against the interests of the Union.. being in the Echelon should be one reason (and it's not only UK.. many small european countries has agreements with USA, and small participations in the echelon...) :roll:
Well, I wouldn't call Germany a small country. It's a pity, but the, at least to my knowledge, largest echelon installation is located in Bad Aibling, Bavaria. Officially, it oberves Yugoslavia and the Middle East....
User avatar
Donald
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3627
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 8:02 pm
Location: Geilenkirchen

Post by Donald »

BossaNova wrote:one country should only be expelled from the Union when it has attitudes that goes against the interests of the Union.. being in the Echelon should be one reason (and it's not only UK.. many small european countries has agreements with USA, and small participations in the echelon...) :roll:
Echelon is not a German attitude. It is something which was created in the years 1948-1952. It is an American institution, which was installed before the Federal Republic of Germany gained sovereignity. It is quite difficult to get rid of it. There is no clear description of its purpose. After 9/11 one can argue it helps to fight the realm of evil or so. Americans would probably argue that it defends the free world. I can imagine that Echelon is abused for economic espionage, but I don't have any proof.
If other European countries feel molested by Echelon, they should formally demand clarification from the German government. If this is done with some publicity it will surely help to make it a topic here in Germany. Momentarily, virtually nobody cares.
User avatar
Olivier
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3358
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 9:58 pm
Location: Evian

Post by Olivier »

iveohc wrote:
Well, I wouldn't call Germany a small country. It's a pity, but the, at least to my knowledge, largest echelon installation is located in Bad Aibling, Bavaria. Officially, it oberves Yugoslavia and the Middle East....
Really :?: 8O :x

There are echelon installation in Canada too... :evil: :(
Post Reply

Return to “Europe-Board”