Do you say you know a language
- when you've learned a language for some years
- when you can have plain talk in that language
- when you can have more then plain talk in that language
- when you know the language perfectly (like when it's your mother tongue?)
I would not say when you've learned a language for some years, because that says nothing..I've learned French for 5 years, but my Spanish that I've learned for 2 years is just as good.
And how about languages you can only read? Like I've had Latin on school for 5 years, I can read it with a dictionary, but isn't that with all languages? Although i think the difference is that from Latin i know the structure, from all those other languages not..
And also a question: if you already learned to read Ancient-Greek and you're learning now New-Greek as well reading as speaking, is it then a new language, or just a continuation of the Ancient-Greek
And for example if you are Dutch, you can understand South-African or even Swedish, don't you think it's stupid to say when people ask for your languages that you can understand South-African? I think it is...
So where is the border between knowing a language and not?
Here end my language philosophy questions


